Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38898155›Full record

Observational studyArchives of osteoporosis2024

High and very high risk of osteoporotic fracture in Colombia, 2003-2022: identifying diagnostic and treatment gaps.

Juan Felipe Betancur, Luz Eugenia Pérez, Jhon Edwar Bolaños-López, Verónica Bernal

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Archives of osteoporosis, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Adequacy of pharmacological prescription in patients at very high risk of fracture within the FLS in Spain: analysis of the REFRA FLS-SEIOMM Registry.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025
    Observational
  2. Design and radiological confirmation of three-column cortical bone trajectory in the lower thoracic vertebrae.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Juan Felipe Betancur *Internal Medicine Investigation Unit, Centro de Investigaciones Clínicas SURA, Medellín, Colombia. juanfebp@hotmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-1331-6605
Luz Eugenia Pérez *Gestora Metodológica Grupo de Investigación Clínica y Ensayos Clínicos SURA, Medellín, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-9054-847X
Jhon Edwar Bolaños-López *Investigation Unit, Grupo de Investigación Clínica y Ensayos Clínicos SURA, Medellín, Colombia.
Verónica Bernal *Investigation Unit, Grupo de Investigación Clínica y Ensayos Clínicos SURA, Medellín, Colombia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examined the clinical characteristics and refracture rates of Colombian patients with high- and very high-risk osteoporosis. This reveals osteoporosis diagnoses and treatment gaps. Only 5.3% of the patients were diagnosed with osteoporosis at discharge and 70.5% had refractures. This finding underscores the need for national policies to enhance osteoporosis prevention and treatment. PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess the clinical features and refracture rates among patients with high- and very-high-risk osteoporosis in Colombia, highlighting diagnostic and treatment gaps.

methodsA retrospective observational study was conducted using the medical records of patients aged ≥ 50 years who experienced fragility fractures between 2003 and 2022. Clinical and demographic characteristics at the time of the initial fracture were analyzed, as well as the subsequent imminent risk (refracture rate) and the diagnosis and treatment gap.

results303.982 fragility fractures occurred, and only 5.3% of patients were diagnosed with osteoporosis upon discharge. The most prevalent index fractures were forearm, vertebral, rib, and hip. Only 17.8% of the cohort had a matched osteoporosis diagnosis, indicating a low healthcare capture. Among the diagnosed patients, 10.08% were classified as high- and very high-risk of fracture, predominantly women with a mean age of 73 years. Comorbidities included diabetes, Sjögren's syndrome, and heart failure. The prevalence of osteoporosis has increased significantly from 2004 to 2022, possibly due to improved detection methods, an aging population, or a combination of both. Despite this increase, treatment delay was evident. Refractures affected 70.5% of the patients, with forearm, hip, humerus, and vertebral fractures being the most common, with a mean time of refracture of 7 months.

conclusionSignificant delays were observed in the diagnosis and treatment of fragility fractures. Colombia's government and health system must address osteoporosis by implementing national policies that prioritize osteoporosis and fragility fracture prevention and reduce delays in diagnosis and treatment.

Indexed as

OsteoporosisOsteoporotic FracturesAgedAged, 80 and overColombiaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsFragility fractureOsteoporosisOsteoporosis diagnosisOsteoporosis treatmentRisk factorsTherapeuticTrends

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.