Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38897936›Full record

ReviewMagnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine2024

Reproducible Research Practices in Magnetic Resonance Neuroimaging: A Review Informed by Advanced Language Models.

Agah Karakuzu, Mathieu Boudreau, Nikola Stikov

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Advanced Techniques for MR Neuroimaging.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Agah KarakuzuNeuroPoly Lab, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Polytechnique Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
Mathieu BoudreauNeuroPoly Lab, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Polytechnique Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
Nikola StikovNeuroPoly Lab, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Polytechnique Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MRI has progressed significantly with the introduction of advanced computational methods and novel imaging techniques, but their wider adoption hinges on their reproducibility. This concise review synthesizes reproducible research insights from recent MRI articles to examine the current state of reproducibility in neuroimaging, highlighting key trends and challenges. It also provides a custom generative pretrained transformer (GPT) model, designed specifically for aiding in an automated analysis and synthesis of information pertaining to the reproducibility insights associated with the articles at the core of this review.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingNeuroimagingBrainHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedReproducibility of Resultsmagnetic resonance imaging methodsreproducibilityscoping review

Identifiers

PMID38897936
PMCPMC11234949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.