Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38897724›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2024

Distinct Action Signals by Subregions in the Nucleus Accumbens during STOP-Change Performance.

Sydney E Ashton, Paul Sharalla, Naru Kang, Adam T Brockett, Margaret M McCarthy, Matthew R Roesch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Epigenetic manipulation of anterior insular cortex alters neural signals and cognitive control.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sydney E AshtonProgram in Neuroscience, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland 21201 mroesch@umd.edu sashton@umaryland.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-8987-0827
Paul SharallaDepartment of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742.
Naru KangDepartment of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742.
Adam T BrockettDepartment of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742.ORCID 0000-0001-7712-5053
Margaret M McCarthyProgram in Neuroscience, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland 21201.ORCID 0000-0003-2243-4726
Matthew R RoeschDepartment of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742 mroesch@umd.edu sashton@umaryland.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-2854-6593

Funding

Neuroinflammation, Epigenetics and Male VulnerabilityR01MH052716 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI MARGARET M. MCCARTHY · 2000 to 2026
$9.6M
Restoration and Further Assessment of the Actor-Critic Circuit and Connected Areas After Cocaine Self-AdministrationR01DA031695 · NIDA · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI MATTHEW R ROESCH · 2011 to 2026
$4.8M
AMINO ACID TRANSMITTERS AND BRAIN SEXUAL DIFFERENCESR29MH052716 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI MCCARTHY, MARGARET M · 1995 to 1999
–
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA031695NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH052716NIMH NIH HHS R29 MH052716
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The nucleus accumbens (NAc) is thought to contribute to motivated behavior by signaling the value of reward-predicting cues and the delivery of anticipated reward. The NAc is subdivided into core and shell, with each region containing different populations of neurons that increase or decrease firing to rewarding events. While there are numerous theories of functions pertaining to these subregions and cell types, most are in the context of reward processing, with fewer considering that the NAc might serve functions related to action selection more generally. We recorded from single neurons in the NAc as rats of both sexes performed a STOP-change task that is commonly used to study motor control and impulsivity. In this task, rats respond quickly to a spatial cue on 80% of trials (GO) and must stop and redirect planned movement on 20% of trials (STOP). We found that the activity of reward-excited neurons signaled accurate response direction on GO, but not STOP, trials and that these neurons exhibited higher precue firing after correct trials. In contrast, reward-inhibited neurons significantly represented response direction on STOP trials at the time of the instrumental response. Finally, the proportion of reward-excited to reward-inhibited neurons and the strength of precue firing decreased as the electrode traversed the NAc. We conclude that reward-excited cells (more common in core) promote proactive action selection, while reward-inhibited cells (more common in shell) contribute to accurate responding on STOP trials that require reactive suppression and redirection of behavior.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsNeuronsNucleus AccumbensRats, Long-EvansRewardAnimalsConditioning, OperantCuesFemaleMalePsychomotor PerformanceRatsReaction Timeaction selectionimpulsivityinhibitionnucleus accumbensratsingle unitstop-signal

Identifiers

PMID38897724
PMCPMC11255435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.