Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38897625›Full record

Trial reportBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2024

Nab-paclitaxel, cisplatin, and capecitabine versus cisplatin and gemcitabine as first line chemotherapy in patients with recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: randomised phase 3 clinical trial.

Guo-Ying Liu, Yan-Fang Ye, Yao-Fei Jiang, Gina Jinna Chen, Wei-Xiong Xia, Yi-Sheng Huang, Tian-Sheng Gao, Yi-Min Liu, Ya-Ting Hou, Jian-Fei Li and 12 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Guo-Ying LiuDepartment of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of NPC Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China.
Yan-Fang YeClinical Research Design Division, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Medical Research Center, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Yao-Fei JiangDepartment of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of NPC Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China.
Gina Jinna ChenSouthern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China.
Wei-Xiong XiaDepartment of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of NPC Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China.
Yi-Sheng HuangDepartment of Oncology, Maoming People's Hospital, Maoming, China.
Tian-Sheng GaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Wuzhou Red Cross Hospital, Wuzhou, China.
Yi-Min LiuDepartment of Oncology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Medical Research Center, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Ya-Ting HouDepartment of Oncology, Maoming People's Hospital, Maoming, China.
Jian-Fei LiDepartment of Oncology, Maoming People's Hospital, Maoming, China.
Jia-Hao LiuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Wuzhou Red Cross Hospital, Wuzhou, China.
Nian LuDepartment of Medical Imaging, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of NPC Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
Chang-Long ChenDepartment of Oncology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Medical Research Center, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Liang-Ru KeDepartment of Medical Imaging, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of NPC Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
Hu LiangDepartment of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of NPC Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China.
Wei-Xin BeiDepartment of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of NPC Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China.
Wang-Zhong LiDepartment of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of NPC Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China.
Shu-Hui DongDepartment of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of NPC Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China.
Qin LiuDepartment of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of NPC Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China.
Changqing XieThoracic and GI Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
He-Rui YaoDepartment of Oncology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Medical Research Center, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Yan-Qun XiangDepartment of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of NPC Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4334-3794

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare the effectiveness and safety of nab-paclitaxel, cisplatin, and capecitabine (nab-TPC) with gemcitabine and cisplatin as an alternative first line treatment option for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

designPhase 3, open label, multicentre, randomised trial.

settingFour hospitals located in China between September 2019 and August 2022.

participantsAdults (≥18 years) with recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

interventionsPatients were randomised in a 1:1 ratio to treatment with either nab-paclitaxel (200 g/m

main outcome measuresProgression-free survival was evaluated by the independent review committee as the primary endpoint in the intention-to-treat population.

resultsThe median follow-up was 15.8 months in the prespecified interim analysis (31 October 2022). As assessed by the independent review committee, the median progression-free survival was 11.3 (95% confidence interval 9.7 to 12.9) months in the nab-TPC cohort compared with 7.7 (6.5 to 9.0) months in the gemcitabine and cisplatin cohort. The hazard ratio was 0.43 (95% confidence interval 0.25 to 0.73; P=0.002). The objective response rate in the nab-TPC cohort was 83% (34/41) versus 63% (25/40) in the gemcitabine and cisplatin cohort (P=0.05), and the duration of response was 10.8 months in the nab-TPC cohort compared with 6.9 months in the gemcitabine and cisplatin cohort (P=0.009). Treatment related grade 3 or 4 adverse events, including leukopenia (4/41 (10%)

conclusionThe nab-TPC regimen showed a superior antitumoural efficacy and favourable safety profile compared with gemcitabine and cisplatin for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Nab-TPC should be considered the standard first line treatment for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Longer follow-up is needed to confirm the benefits for overall survival.

trial registrationChinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR1900027112.

Indexed as

AlbuminsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCapecitabineCisplatinDeoxycytidineGemcitabineNasopharyngeal CarcinomaNasopharyngeal NeoplasmsNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPaclitaxelAdultAgedChinaFemaleHumansMale130-nm albumin-bound paclitaxelAlbuminsCapecitabineCisplatinDeoxycytidineGemcitabinePaclitaxel

Identifiers

PMID38897625
PMCPMC11190944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.