Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38897616›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2024

Rising caesarean section rates and factors affecting women's decision-making about mode of birth in Indonesia: a longitudinal qualitative study.

Rana Islamiah Zahroh, Alya Hazfiarini, Moya Ad Martiningtyas, Fitriana Murriya Ekawati, Ova Emilia, Marc Cheong, Ana Pilar Betran, Caroline Se Homer, Meghan A Bohren

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Rana Islamiah ZahrohGender and Women's Health Unit, Nossal Institute for Global Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia r.zahroh@unimelb.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7831-2336
Alya HazfiariniGender and Women's Health Unit, Nossal Institute for Global Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2097-0245
Moya Ad MartiningtyasTechnology, Health, Education, Social, and Environment (THESE) Initiatives, Mataram, Indonesia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4442-9306
Fitriana Murriya EkawatiDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3622-0510
Ova EmiliaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
Marc CheongFaculty of Engineering and Information Technology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0637-3436
Ana Pilar BetranUNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5631-5883
Caroline Se HomerMaternal, Child, and Adolescent Health Programme, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7454-3011
Meghan A BohrenGender and Women's Health Unit, Nossal Institute for Global Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4179-4682

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCaesarean section (CS) rates in Indonesia are increasing rapidly. Understanding women's preferences about mode of birth is important to help contextualise these rising rates and can help develop interventions to optimise CS. This study aimed to explore Indonesian women's preferences and decision-making about mode of birth, and how their preferences may change throughout pregnancy and birth.

methodsWe conducted a longitudinal qualitative study using in-depth interviews with 28 women accessing private and public health facilities in Jakarta, the region with the highest CS rates. Interviews were conducted two times: during the woman's third trimester of pregnancy and in the postpartum period, between October 2022 and March 2023. We used a reflexive thematic approach for analysis.

resultsWe generated three themes: (1) preferences about the mode of birth, (2) decision-making about the mode of birth and (3) regrets about the actual mode of birth. Most women preferred vaginal birth. However, they were influenced by advertisements promoting enhanced recovery after CS (ERACS) as an 'advanced technique' of CS, promising a comfortable, painless and faster recovery birth. This messaging influenced women to perceive CS as equivalent or even superior to vaginal birth. Where women's preferences for mode of birth shifted around the time of birth, this was primarily due to the obstetricians' discretion. Women felt they did not receive adequate information from obstetricians on the benefits and risks of CS and vaginal birth and felt disappointed when their actual mode of birth was not aligned with their preferences.

conclusionOur study shows that despite rising CS rates, Indonesian women prefer vaginal birth. This highlights the need for better communication strategies and evidence-based information from healthcare providers. Given the rising popularity of ERACS, more work is urgently needed to standardise and regulate its use.

Indexed as

Cesarean SectionDecision MakingPatient PreferenceQualitative ResearchAdultFemaleHumansIndonesiaInterviews as TopicLongitudinal StudiesPregnancyYoung AdultGlobal HealthHealth policyMaternal healthPublic HealthQualitative study

Identifiers

PMID38897616
PMCPMC11191729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.