ReviewCell reports. Medicine2024
Addressing the gender paradox: Effective suicide prevention strategies for women.
Review in Cell reports. Medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Brief interventions for suicidal ideation in primary care: a systematic review.BMC primary care · 2025Pooled it
- Frequency and correlates of suicidality in a sample of traumatized treatment-seeking refugees.BMC psychiatry · 2026Trial
- Hospital-Presenting Intentional Self-Harm and Events of Undetermined Intent in Croatia from 2017 to 2023.Journal of prevention (2022) · 2026Article
- Trends of non-lethal intentional self-harm and suicide in Spain 2018-2023: a nationwide registry-based study.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2025Article
- Associations between suicidal ideation and childhood maltreatment as well as inflammatory cytokines in adolescents with major depressive disorder.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2025Article
- The associations of suicidal ideation with psychopathology and inflammatory cytokines in patients with chronic schizophrenia.BMC psychiatry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The gender paradox in suicide research refers to the phenomenon that while males report higher suicide mortality, females suffer more from suicidal thoughts, leading to higher suicidal risks. This paradox may lead to the misconception that female suicides do not require as much attention. Therefore, there is an urgent need for researchers to shift their perspectives from the current male-centric approach to more inclusive knowledge for female suicidality. Following this, the current commentary emphasizes the importance of identifying and addressing the crucial but overlooked psychosocial factors underlying female suicidality. In addition, the ecological framework is employed as a guiding tool for exploring the intricate interplay of biological, psychological, societal, and cultural factors that are associated with female suicidality, thereby allowing researchers and stakeholders to develop more effective prevention and intervention strategies tailored to women's needs. Overall, this commentary calls for more refined and equitable approaches to suicide prevention that address the needs of individuals for all gender identities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.