Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38896583›Full record

ArticleThe ISME journal2024

Intestinal persistence of Bifidobacterium infantis is determined by interaction of host genetics and antibiotic exposure.

Yiming Wang, Jocelyn M Choo, Alyson C Richard, Lito E Papanicolas, Steve L Wesselingh, Steven L Taylor, Geraint B Rogers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ISME journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. The therapeutic promise of probioticFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yiming WangMicrobiome and Host Health Programme, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia 5001, Australia.
Jocelyn M ChooMicrobiome and Host Health Programme, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia 5001, Australia.
Alyson C RichardMicrobiome and Host Health Programme, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia 5001, Australia.
Lito E PapanicolasMicrobiome and Host Health Programme, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia 5001, Australia.
Steve L WesselinghMicrobiome and Host Health Programme, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia 5001, Australia.
Steven L TaylorMicrobiome and Host Health Programme, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia 5001, Australia.
Geraint B RogersMicrobiome and Host Health Programme, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia 5001, Australia.

Funding

Flinders International Postgraduate Research ScholarshipMatthew Flinders Professorial FellowshipNational Health and Medical Research Council GNT119378NHMRC Emerging Leadership GNT2008625South Australia Health and Medical Research Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Probiotics have gained significant attention as a potential strategy to improve health by modulating host-microbe interactions, particularly in situations where the normal microbiota has been disrupted. However, evidence regarding their efficacy has been inconsistent, with considerable interindividual variability in response. We aimed to explore whether a common genetic variant that affects the production of mucosal α(1,2)-fucosylated glycans, present in around 20% of the population, could explain the observed interpersonal differences in the persistence of commonly used probiotics. Using a mouse model with varying α(1,2)-fucosylated glycans secretion (Fut2WT or Fut2KO), we examined the abundance and persistence of Bifidobacterium strains (infantis, breve, and bifidum). We observed significant differences in baseline gut microbiota characteristics between Fut2WT and Fut2KO littermates, with Fut2WT mice exhibiting enrichment of species able to utilize α(1,2)-fucosylated glycans. Following antibiotic exposure, only Fut2WT animals showed persistent engraftment of Bifidobacterium infantis, a strain able to internalize α(1,2)-fucosylated glycans, whereas B. breve and B. bifidum, which cannot internalize α(1,2)-fucosylated glycans, did not exhibit this difference. In mice with an intact commensal microbiota, the relationship between secretor status and B. infantis persistence was reversed, with Fut2KO animals showing greater persistence compared to Fut2WT. Our findings suggest that the interplay between a common genetic variation and antibiotic exposure plays a crucial role in determining the dynamics of B. infantis in the recipient gut, which could potentially contribute to the observed variation in response to this commonly used probiotic species.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsFucosyltransferasesGalactoside 2-alpha-L-fucosyltransferaseGastrointestinal MicrobiomeProbioticsAnimalsBifidobacteriumBifidobacterium longum subspecies infantisHost Microbial InteractionsMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, KnockoutPolysaccharidesAnti-Bacterial AgentsFucosyltransferasesGalactoside 2-alpha-L-fucosyltransferasePolysaccharidesBifidobacteriumBifidobacterium infantismicrobiomesecretor statusα(1, 2)-fucosylated glycans

Identifiers

PMID38896583
PMCPMC11214156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.