ArticleProsthetics and orthotics international2024
Orthotist involvement in early gait rehabilitation after stroke: A cross-sectional survey of orthotists in the United Kingdom.
Article in Prosthetics and orthotics international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Professional consensus on UK national statements of best practice for ways of working to deliver orthotic interventions after stroke: an eDelphi study.Journal of rehabilitation medicine · 2026Article
- Assessment of rehabilitation treatment for patients with acute poisoning-induced toxic encephalopathy.World journal of emergency medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe role of the orthotist in early gait rehabilitation after stroke in the United Kingdom is currently poorly understood.
objectivesThe objective of this study was to capture current opinion and practice of orthotists on their role in early stroke gait rehabilitation in the United Kingdom.
methodsAn anonymous web-based cross-sectional survey was developed and distributed to Health and Care Professions Council-registered orthotists by the mailing list of the British Association of Prosthetists and Orthotists professional body in the United Kingdom. Survey items were multiple-choice, Likert scale, or open-ended questions to explore the experiences and opinions of orthotists in early poststroke gait rehabilitation.
resultsResponses were received from 56 participants. Orthotists reported having regular contact with patients who had a stroke within their usual clinical caseload. Multidisciplinary care was not typical with 46% respondents "rarely" seeing patients who had a stroke in joint assessment with another clinician. Confidence in managing lower limb gait difficulties was high, with 89% of orthotists feeling able to recommend a lower limb orthotic treatment. Ninety-eight percent (n = 55) of respondents agreed that orthotic assessment should be an essential element of gait re-education after stroke; however, orthotists reported limited involvement within early stroke rehabilitation.
conclusionUK orthotists surveyed in this study report that orthotic treatment is an important aspect of early gait rehabilitation after stroke. Respondents report barriers to multidisciplinary working, which may affect outcomes in this patient group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.