ArticleIEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering2024
Electrode Surface Area Impacts Measurement of High Frequency Oscillations in Human Intracranial EEG.
Article in IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Common Data Elements for Preclinical High-Frequency Oscillations in Epilepsy.Epilepsy currents · 2026Review
- Thermally Drawn Multifunctional All-Hydrogel Fibers for Anti-Fibrotic and Multimodal Neural Interfaces.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026Article
- Deep learning in intracranial EEG for seizure detection: advances, challenges, and clinical applications.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveHigh-frequency oscillations (HFOs) are a promising prognostic biomarker of surgical outcome in patients with epilepsy. Their rates of occurrence and morphology have been studied extensively using recordings from electrodes of various geometries. While electrode size is a potential confounding factor in HFO studies, it has largely been disregarded due to a lack of consistent evidence. Therefore, we designed an experiment to directly test the impact of electrode size on HFO measurement.
methodsWe first simulated HFO measurement using a lumped model of the electrode-tissue interaction. Then eight human subjects were each implanted with a high-density 8x8 grid of subdural electrodes. After implantation, the electrode sizes were altered using a technique recently developed by our group, enabling intracranial EEG recordings for three different electrode surface areas from a static brain location. HFOs were automatically detected in the data and their characteristics were calculated.
resultsThe human subject measurements were consistent with the model. Specifically, HFO rate measured per area of tissue decreased significantly as electrode surface area increased. The smallest electrodes recorded more fast ripples than ripples. Amplitude of detected HFOs also decreased as electrode surface area increased, while duration and peak frequency were unaffected.
conclusionThese results suggest that HFO rates measured using electrodes of different surface areas cannot be compared directly. SIGNIFICANCE: This has significant implications for HFOs as a tool for surgical planning, particularly for individual patients implanted with electrodes of multiple sizes and comparisons of HFO rate made across patients and studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.