ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2024
Virtual reconstruction of orbital defects using Gaussian process morphable models.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe conventional method to reconstruct the bone level for orbital defects, which is based on mirroring and manual adaptation, is time-consuming and the accuracy highly depends on the expertise of the clinical engineer. The aim of this study is to propose and evaluate an automated reconstruction method utilizing a Gaussian process morphable model (GPMM).
methodsSixty-five Computed Tomography (CT) scans of healthy midfaces were used to create a GPMM that can model shape variations of the orbital region. Parameter optimization was performed by evaluating several quantitative metrics inspired on the shape modeling literature, e.g. generalization and specificity. The reconstruction error was estimated by reconstructing artificial defects created in orbits from fifteen CT scans that were not included in the GPMM. The developed algorithms utilize the existing framework of Gaussian process morphable models, as implemented in the Scalismo software.
resultsBy evaluating the proposed quality metrics, adequate parameters are chosen for non-rigid registration and reconstruction. The resulting median reconstruction error using the GPMM was lower (0.35 ± 0.16 mm) compared to the mirroring method (0.52 ± 0.18 mm). In addition, the GPMM-based reconstruction is automated and can be applied to large bilateral defects with a median reconstruction error of 0.39 ± 0.11 mm.
conclusionThe GPMM-based reconstruction proves to be less time-consuming and more accurate than reconstruction by mirroring. Further validation through clinical studies on patients with orbital defects is warranted. Nevertheless, the results underscore the potential of GPMM-based reconstruction as a promising alternative for designing patient-specific implants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38896405What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.