Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38896405›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2024

Virtual reconstruction of orbital defects using Gaussian process morphable models.

Pieter Vanslambrouck, Jeroen Van Dessel, Constantinus Politis, Robin Willaert, Michel Bila, Yi Sun, Peter Claes

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Pieter VanslambrouckDepartment of Computer Science, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. vanslambrouck.pieter@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-2835-5292
Jeroen Van DesselDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. jeroen.vandessel@kuleuven.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5084-8710
Constantinus PolitisDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Robin WillaertDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Michel BilaDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Yi Sun *Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. yi.sun@uzleuven.be.
Peter Claes *Department of Electrical Engineering, ESAT/PSI, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe conventional method to reconstruct the bone level for orbital defects, which is based on mirroring and manual adaptation, is time-consuming and the accuracy highly depends on the expertise of the clinical engineer. The aim of this study is to propose and evaluate an automated reconstruction method utilizing a Gaussian process morphable model (GPMM).

methodsSixty-five Computed Tomography (CT) scans of healthy midfaces were used to create a GPMM that can model shape variations of the orbital region. Parameter optimization was performed by evaluating several quantitative metrics inspired on the shape modeling literature, e.g. generalization and specificity. The reconstruction error was estimated by reconstructing artificial defects created in orbits from fifteen CT scans that were not included in the GPMM. The developed algorithms utilize the existing framework of Gaussian process morphable models, as implemented in the Scalismo software.

resultsBy evaluating the proposed quality metrics, adequate parameters are chosen for non-rigid registration and reconstruction. The resulting median reconstruction error using the GPMM was lower (0.35 ± 0.16 mm) compared to the mirroring method (0.52 ± 0.18 mm). In addition, the GPMM-based reconstruction is automated and can be applied to large bilateral defects with a median reconstruction error of 0.39 ± 0.11 mm.

conclusionThe GPMM-based reconstruction proves to be less time-consuming and more accurate than reconstruction by mirroring. Further validation through clinical studies on patients with orbital defects is warranted. Nevertheless, the results underscore the potential of GPMM-based reconstruction as a promising alternative for designing patient-specific implants.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsOrbitTomography, X-Ray ComputedHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalNormal DistributionComputer-assisted surgeryGaussian process morphable modelOrbital reconstructionPatient-specific implantStatistical shape model

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.