Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38896382›Full record

ArticleDermatology and therapy2024

Insights into the Window of Opportunity and Outcome Measures in Patients with Moderate to Severe Hidradenitis Suppurativa Treated with Secukinumab: A Real-World Study.

Sofía Haselgruber, Pablo Fernández-Crehuet-Serrano, María Dolores Fernández-Ballesteros, Alicia Padial-Gómez, Juan Carlos Hernández-Rodríguez, Juan Ortiz-Álvarez, Pedro Navarro-Guillamón, Cristina Membrive-Jiménez, Carlos Cuenca-Barrales, Alejandro Molina-Leyva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dermatology and therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Towards the development of upgrade criteria for the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa with biologics.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sofía HaselgruberServicio de Dermatología, Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, Spain.
Pablo Fernández-Crehuet-SerranoServicio de Dermatología, Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía, Córdoba, Spain.
María Dolores Fernández-BallesterosServicio de Dermatología, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Málaga, Spain.
Alicia Padial-GómezServicio de Dermatología, Hospital Universitario de Jerez de la Frontera, Cádiz, Spain.
Juan Carlos Hernández-RodríguezServicio de Dermatología, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville, Spain.
Juan Ortiz-ÁlvarezServicio de Dermatología, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville, Spain.
Pedro Navarro-GuillamónServicio de Dermatología, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain.
Cristina Membrive-JiménezDepartamento de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular II, Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain.
Carlos Cuenca-BarralesServicio de Dermatología, Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, Spain. carloscuenca1991@gmail.com.
Alejandro Molina-LeyvaServicio de Dermatología, Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introducionThe concept of a window of opportunity in hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) management suggests that early initiation of biological therapy leads to better outcomes, though its timing remains uncertain.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective observational multicenter study, including consecutive patients with moderate to severe HS who initiated secukinumab treatment following prior failure with systemic antibiotics or adalimumab. Therapeutic burden was defined as the sum of previous systemic treatment cycles and previous major surgical interventions for HS. Patients were followed up for 24 weeks. Main outcomes were safety and effectiveness, assessed through the proportion of patients achieving HS Clinical Response (HiSCR) and a 55% reduction in International HS Severity Score System (IHS4-55). Additionally, potential predictors of response to secukinumab were studied. Analysis was performed on an intention-to-treat basis.

resultsA total of 67 patients (33 men, 34 women) were included, with a mean age of 41.55 (11.94) years and a mean baseline IHS4 of 17.88 (11.13). The mean therapeutic burden was 6.06 (3.49). At week 24, 10.45% (7/67) of patients experienced adverse events, with three leading to treatment discontinuation. At week 24, 41.79% (28/67) of patients achieved HiSCR, and 44.78% (30/67) of patients achieved IHS4-55. HiSCR could not be calculated in 12 patients with a baseline AN count < 3. A lower therapeutic burden was significantly associated with a higher likelihood of achieving HiSCR and IHS4-55 at week 24.

conclusionsSecukinumab showed safety and efficacy in real-world patients with HS, and the inverse correlation found between therapeutic burden and treatment response supports the concept of a window of opportunity, offering insights into its timing.

Indexed as

Hidradenitis suppurativaHiSCRIHS-4Response predictorsSecukinumabTherapeutic burdenWindow of opportunity

Identifiers

PMID38896382
PMCPMC11264522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.