ArticleCEN case reports2025
Hyperkalemia presentation at a clinic during the cold season.
Article in CEN case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Spurious Hyperkalemia Without Hemolysis: A Case-Based Presentation of Preanalytical Errors and Diagnostic Pitfalls.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Pathophysiology and causes of hyperkalemia: unraveling causes beyond kidney dysfunction.Clinical and experimental nephrology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Familial pseudohyperkalemia (FP) is an underrecognized cause of pseudohyperkalemia, caused by the leaking of potassium from red blood cells. This extracellular shift of potassium is temperature-dependent and occurs when blood samples are stored below room temperature or for a long time, manifesting as apparent hyperkalemia. We report a suspicious case of FP, which demonstrated an apparent seasonal trajectory of serum-potassium levels at the local clinic. At first, laboratory test results did not show an increase in the serum-potassium levels in our tertiary hospital. However, by replicating the clinic's storage conditions, the patient's serum sample showed hyperkalemia only when it was stored at a temperature of 4 °C or 20 °C for 4-8 h. Hyperkalemia was not observed in the patient's sample when it was stored at 37 °C, or in the healthy control's sample at a temperature of 20 °C or 37 °C. When encountering hyperkalemia without an obvious cause and symptoms, physicians should consider pseudohyperkalemia in the differential diagnosis. In particular, if a seasonal trajectory of serum-potassium levels is observed, FP should be suspected as a potential cause of pseudohyperkalemia. Although a genetic test is needed to properly diagnose FP, confirming it by verifying the sample storage conditions or proving it by replicating the test using different storage conditions is easy and very important, as it can prevent unnecessary treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.