Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38896293›Full record

ReviewJournal of robotic surgery2024

How does robotic surgery affect gynecology patient care?

Sibel Arslan, Katri Vehviläinen-Julkunen, Anndra Parviainen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of robotic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sibel ArslanDepartment of Surgical Diseases Nursing Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, Kilis 7 Aralık Universty, Kilis, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4997-7045
Katri Vehviläinen-JulkunenDepartment of Nursing Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, Kuopio University Hospital, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland. katri.vehvilainenjulkunen@uef.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6828-8261
Anndra ParviainenDepartment of Nursing Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Institute of Public Health and Clinical Nutrition, Universty Eastern of Finland, Kuopio, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5979-0826

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this review is to map the current research on the needs of gynecological patients treated with robotic surgery. Systematic Rapid Review. Pubmed, Web of Science, Google Scholar. Search was limited from the years 2017-2021. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement was followed. Rapid review is a synthesis of information produced in a shorter time than systematic reviews, which allows clinical nurses to access evidence in the decision-making process. The methodological steps implemented were the following: (1) needs assessment and topic selection, (2) study development, (3) literature search, (4) screening and study selection, (5) data extraction, (6) risk-of-bias assessment and (7) knowledge synthesis. The search yielded 815 articles, 746 were excluded after screening the title and abstract, and 69 full-text syntheses were performed. Only 10 articles were included in the final analysis. This research evaluated the effects of robotic surgery on the patient under seven themes; operative time, length of stay, complications, estimated blood loss, pain, survivor, and conversion. Five studies were on endometrial cancer, one study on gynecologic cancer, two studies on hysterectomy, one study on patient safety, and one study on cervical cancer. The results show that robotic surgery can change the needs of patients by solving ongoing problems in gynecological patients. This requires a better understanding of robotic surgery procedures while facilitating nursing care over patient care.

Indexed as

Gynecologic Surgical ProceduresOperative TimePatient CareRobotic Surgical ProceduresBlood Loss, SurgicalEndometrial NeoplasmsFemaleGenital Neoplasms, FemaleHumansHysterectomyLength of StayPatient SafetyPostoperative ComplicationsUterine Cervical NeoplasmsGynecological robotic surgeryPatient needRobotic surgeryRobotic surgery nursing

Identifiers

PMID38896293
PMCPMC11186900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.