ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2024
The impact of fetal sex on pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in twin gestation.
Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development of a machine learning model to identify the predictors of the neonatal intensive care unit admission.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeFetal sex is independently associated with pregnancy complications and impacts neonatal outcomes. Evidence suggests that females have an advantage over males, with a better outcome in the perinatal period. In addition, fetal outcome in twin gestations is also related to the intrauterine position of the fetus, such as the first, the presenting or second twin. It has been demonstrated that the neonatal outcome of the second fetus is worse than that of the first fetus. This study aimed to examine the influence of fetal sex on obstetric outcomes in twin pregnancies based on the location of the fetus in the uterus.
methodsRetrospective study. Maternal and obstetric outcomes were compared among three groups: male‒male, female‒female, and male‒female groups. Comparisons of neonatal outcomes were performed among the four groups: male A-male B, male A-female B, female A-male B, and female A-female B.
resultsA total of 1073 twin gestations were included, comprising 288 male‒male, 288 female‒female, and 497 male‒female gestations. A greater percentage of neonates admitted to the NICU was observed for male fetuses than for female fetuses. Adverse composite neonatal outcome was more common in the male‒male group than in the female‒male group and in the female‒female group.
conclusionTwin gestation with a first twin male tends to have worse neonatal outcomes than does twin gestation with a first twin female. The presence of a male co-twin increases the risk of adverse outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38896275What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.