Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38896250›Full record

ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2024

Transition-zone PSA-density calculated from MRI deep learning prostate zonal segmentation model for prediction of clinically significant prostate cancer.

Shiba Kuanar, Jason Cai, Hirotsugu Nakai, Hiroki Nagayama, Hiroaki Takahashi, Jordan LeGout, Akira Kawashima, Adam Froemming, Lance Mynderse, Chandler Dora and 5 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Shiba Kuanar *Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Jason Cai *Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Hirotsugu NakaiDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Hiroki NagayamaDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Hiroaki TakahashiDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Jordan LeGoutDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Akira KawashimaDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.
Adam FroemmingDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Lance MynderseDepartment of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Chandler DoraDepartment of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Mitchell HumphreysDepartment of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.
Jason KlugDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Panagiotis KorfiatisDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Bradley EricksonDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Naoki TakahashiDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. takahasih.naoki@mayo.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-7946-6078

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo develop a deep learning (DL) zonal segmentation model of prostate MR from T2-weighted images and evaluate TZ-PSAD for prediction of the presence of csPCa (Gleason score of 7 or higher) compared to PSAD.

methods1020 patients with a prostate MRI were randomly selected to develop a DL zonal segmentation model. Test dataset included 20 cases in which 2 radiologists manually segmented both the peripheral zone (PZ) and TZ. Pair-wise Dice index was calculated for each zone. For the prediction of csPCa using PSAD and TZ-PSAD, we used 3461 consecutive MRI exams performed in patients without a history of prostate cancer, with pathological confirmation and available PSA values, but not used in the development of the segmentation model as internal test set and 1460 MRI exams from PI-CAI challenge as external test set. PSAD and TZ-PSAD were calculated from the segmentation model output. The area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) was compared between PSAD and TZ-PSAD using univariate and multivariate analysis (adjusts age) with the DeLong test.

resultsDice scores of the model against two radiologists were 0.87/0.87 and 0.74/0.72 for TZ and PZ, while those between the two radiologists were 0.88 for TZ and 0.75 for PZ. For the prediction of csPCa, the AUCs of TZPSAD were significantly higher than those of PSAD in both internal test set (univariate analysis, 0.75 vs. 0.73, p < 0.001; multivariate analysis, 0.80 vs. 0.78, p < 0.001) and external test set (univariate analysis, 0.76 vs. 0.74, p < 0.001; multivariate analysis, 0.77 vs. 0.75, p < 0.001 in external test set).

conclusionDL model-derived zonal segmentation facilitates the practical measurement of TZ-PSAD and shows it to be a slightly better predictor of csPCa compared to the conventional PSAD. Use of TZ-PSAD may increase the sensitivity of detecting csPCa by 2-5% for a commonly used specificity level.

Indexed as

Deep LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsAgedHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingPredictive Value of TestsProstateRetrospective StudiesProstate-Specific AntigenDeep learningEarly detection of cancerMagnetic resonance imagingProstate specific antigenProstatic neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID38896250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.