ArticleNeuroradiology2024
Characterizing the relationship between MRI radiomics and AHR expression and deriving a predictive model for prognostic assessment in glioblastoma.
Article in Neuroradiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeAryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR), a crucial molecular marker associated with glioma, is a potential therapeutic target. We aimed to establish a non-invasive predictive model for AHR through radiomics.
methodsContrast-enhanced T1-weighted (T1W) MRI and the corresponding and clinical variables of glioblastoma patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA) were obtained for analysis. KM curves and Cox regression analyses were used to assess the prognostic value of AHR expression. The radiomics features were screened by Max-Relevance and Min-Redundancy (mRMR) and recursive feature elimination (RFE), followed by the construction of two predictive models using logistic regression (LR) and a support vector machine (SVM).
resultsThe expression levels of AHR in tumour patients were significantly higher than those in the control group, and higher AHR expression was associated with worse prognosis (P<0.05). AHR remained a risk factor for poor prognosis in glioblastoma after multivariate adjustment (HR: 1.61, 95% CI: 1.085-2.39, P<0.05). The radiomics models constructed using LR and SVM based on three selected features achieved area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.887 and 0.872, respectively. Radiomics score emerged as a key factor influencing overall survival (OS) after multivariate adjustment in the Cox model (HR: 3.931, 95% CI: 1.272-12.148, P < 0.05).
conclusionThe radiomics models could effectively distinguish the expression levels of AHR and predict prognosis in patients with glioblastoma, which may serve as a powerful tool to assist clinical assessment and precision treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38896238What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.