ArticleApplied microbiology and biotechnology2024
Exploring operational boundaries for acoustic concentration of cell suspensions.
Article in Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The development of a standardized, generic method for concentrating suspensions in continuous flow is challenging. In this study, we developed and tested a device capable of concentrating suspensions with an already high cell concentration to meet diverse industrial requirements. To address typical multitasking needs, we concentrated suspensions with high solid content under a variety of conditions. Cells from Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Escherichia coli, and Chinese hamster ovary cells were effectively focused in the center of the main channel of a microfluidic device using acoustophoresis. The main channel bifurcates into three outlets, allowing cells to exit through the central outlet, while the liquid evenly exits through all outlets. Consequently, the treatment separates cells from two-thirds of the surrounding liquid. We investigated the complex interactions between parameters. Increasing the channel depth results in a decrease in process efficiency, attributed to a decline in acoustic energy density. The study also revealed that different cell strains exhibit distinct acoustic contrast factors, originating from differences in dimensions, compressibility, and density values. Finally, a combination of high solid content and flow rate leads to an increase in diffusion through a phenomenon known as shear-induced diffusion. KEY POINTS: • Acoustic focusing in a microchannel was used to concentrate cell suspensions • The parameters influencing focusing at high concentrations were studied • Three different cell strains were successfully concentrated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.