ArticleHepatology communications2024
Landmark analysis of the risk of recurrence after resection or ablation for HCC: A nationwide study.
Article in Hepatology communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Early recurrence prediction and risk stratification of hepatocellular carcinoma after transarterial chemoembolization achieving imaging complete response based on contrast-enhanced CT machine learning.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- Article
- Circulating tumor DNA for minimal residual disease and recurrence surveillance in hepatocellular carcinoma: current evidence and a translational roadmap.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Very Early Recurrence as a Dynamic Prognostic Stratifier After Curative Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Landmark Analysis with Internal Validation and Machine-Learning Benchmarking.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2026Article
- Comments on recurrence patterns in HCC with microvascular invasion.Hepatology international · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe risk of HCC recurrence at particular landmarks since the initial treatment is unknown. With this registry-based study, we aimed to provide a nuanced description of the prognosis following resection or ablation for HCC, including landmark analyses.
methodsUsing the Danish nationwide health care registries, we identified all patients who received resection or ablation in 2000-2018 as the first HCC treatment. HCC recurrence was defined as a new HCC treatment > 90 days after the first treatment. We conducted competing risk landmark analyses of the cumulative risk of recurrence and death.
resultsAmong 4801 patients with HCC, we identified 426 patients who received resection and 544 who received ablation. The 2 treatment cohorts differed in cirrhosis prevalence and tumor stage. The 5-year recurrence risk was 40.7% (95% CI 35.5%-45.8%) following resection and 60.7% (95% CI: 55.9%-65.1%) following ablation. The 1-year recurrence risk decreased over the landmarks from 20.4% (95% CI: 16.6%-24.6%) at the time of resection to 4.7% (95% CI: 0.9%-13.9%) at the 5-year landmark. For ablation, the risk decreased from 36.1% (95% CI: 31.9%-40.4%) at the time of treatment to 5.3% (95% CI: 0.4%-21.4%) at the 5-year landmark. The risk of death without recurrence was stable over the landmarks following both resection and ablation.
conclusionsIn conclusion, the risk of recurrence or death following resection or ablation for HCC is high from the treatment date, but the risk of recurrence decreases greatly over the survival landmarks. This information is valuable for clinicians and their patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.