Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38896062›Full record

ArticleJournal of advanced nursing2025

Epistemological aspects of participatory design studies conducted in the field of health science.

Charlotte Nielsen, Charlotte Myhre Jensen, Bettina Trettin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of advanced nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Charlotte NielsenDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense C, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8920-7758
Charlotte Myhre JensenDepartment of Clinical Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense M, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7058-4641
Bettina TrettinDepartment of Clinical Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense M, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3851-7294

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

AIM(S): To discuss the methodological aspects of participatory design, arguing for a three-phase approach and the suitability of situating participatory design within a phenomenological-hermeneutical tradition in health science. DESIGN AND

methodsMethodological discussion based on participatory design theory, epistemology and research studies.

resultsThe epistemological and methodological discussions show how the core values and key elements of participatory design align with the phenomenological-hermeneutical approach. In addition, examples of participatory design studies are provided to illustrate how it can be conducted in health science.

conclusionParticipatory design is a flexible framework based on genuine participation, defined by three core values: having a say, mutual learning and democratization. The iterative processes allow for adjustments in alignment with the core values and the scientific stance that defines the choice of methods, tools and techniques. A phenomenological-hermeneutic approach in participatory design studies is relevant and aligned with the core values of participatory design. Thus, this paper argues for a close integration between the participatory design methodology and the phenomenological-hermeneutic scientific approach within health science. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION: Participatory design is a powerful methodology with core values that can co-design sustainable health technologies with potential to impact patient care and the clinical practice of nurses. When combined with qualitative research methods, patients' lived experiences serve as the foundation for improving clinical nursing practice. Discussing the epistemological aspects of participatory design provides nurse researchers with a coherent methodological understanding, essential for the continual development of nursing research. IMPACT: This paper discusses the research methodology of participatory design within health sciences. It aims to address the lack of understanding of the methodology, particularly within a specific scientific stance. The main finding is the elaboration on participatory design and the relevance of a phenomenological-hermeneutical approach. The paper has the potential to impact researchers, master's and PhD students, as well as others engaged in participatory design or other methodologies related to user involvement within health science. REPORTING

methodNo available EQUATOR guidelines were applicable to this methodological paper, as no new data were created or analysed. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: There was no direct patient or public contribution, as this is a methodological paper.

Indexed as

KnowledgeNursing ResearchResearch DesignFemaleHermeneuticsHumansMaleepistemologyhealth sciencehermeneuticparticipatory designphenomenologyresearch in practiceresearch methods

Identifiers

PMID38896062
PMCPMC12271664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.