ReviewJournal of genetic counseling2025
A retrospective cohort study and review of the literature about germline mosaicism in Duchenne/Becker muscular dystrophy prenatal counseling: How to estimate the recurrence risk in clinical settings?
Review in Journal of genetic counseling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical, pathological, and genetic characteristics of 23 DMD patients in northern China.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2026Article
- Spectrum and carrier frequency of DMD in Yueyang, China: a population-based analysis using NGS and MLPA.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Article
- Prenatal genetic counselors' attitudes, beliefs, and practices with discussing postnatal Duchenne muscular dystrophy treatment options.Journal of genetic counseling · 2025Article
- A retrospective cohort study and review of the literature about germline mosaicism in Duchenne/Becker muscular dystrophy prenatal counseling: How to estimate the recurrence risk in clinical settings?Journal of genetic counseling · 2025Review
- Conceptualization and design of an Ayurveda framework for the diagnosis of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: insights from a prospective cohort study.Journal of Ayurveda and integrative medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) and Becker muscular dystrophy (BMD) are the most common inherited neuromuscular diseases. Following the identification of a pathogenic causative variant in the DMD gene of a proband, potential carriers can be informed of their risk of having offspring with the disease. Germline mosaicism is a variant that is confined to the gonads that can be transmitted to offspring and is usually reported when a non-carrier of a DMD pathogenic variant has two or more offspring carrying the variant in question. On average, one third of cases are the result of a de novo variant, and as DMD and BMD are prone to germline mosaicism, its inclusion in genetic counseling is mandatory. In this retrospective cohort study, we presented clinical data from an unpublished DMD/BMD cohort of 332 families with incidence of germline mosaicism in families with de novo transmission of 8.1%. This is also the first systematic literature review searching PubMed to provide an accurate assessment of the current literature on germline mosaicism in DMD and BMD, including 17 case reports and 20 original studies. The incidence of documented germline mosaicism in de novo event families ranged from 6.0 to 40%, with a mean of 8.3%. The estimated recurrence risk for mothers of a patient with a proven de novo causal variant ranged from 4.3 to 11%, with a mean of 5.8% for a male fetus. By providing an up-to-date and comprehensive overview of the literature, this review aims to improve our understanding of germline mosaicism in DMD and to promote the development of effective strategies and reliable data for occurrence risk assessment in genetic counseling of de novo event families.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.