Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38895875›Full record

ArticleTranslational behavioral medicine2024

Adaptation of complex interventions for people with long-term conditions: a scoping review.

Jamal Uddin, Vicky L Joshi, Valerie Wells, Mithila Faruque, Saidur R Mashreky, Ani Movsisyan, Rhiannon Evans, Graham Moore, Rod S Taylor

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Translational behavioral medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jamal UddinMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5964-6381
Vicky L JoshiDepartment of Physiotherapy and Paramedicine, School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.
Valerie WellsMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Mithila FaruqueDepartment of Noncommunicable Diseases (NCD), Faculty of Public Health, Bangladesh University of Health Sciences, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Saidur R MashrekyDepartment of Noncommunicable Diseases (NCD), Faculty of Public Health, Bangladesh University of Health Sciences, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Ani MovsisyanInstitute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry and Epidemiology (IBE), Chair of Public Health and Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, LMU Munich. Elisabeth-Winterhalter-Weg 6, 81377 Munich, Germany.
Rhiannon EvansCentre for Development, Evaluation, Complexity, and Implementation in Public Health Improvement (DECIPHer), DECIPHer, School of Social Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Graham MooreCentre for Development, Evaluation, Complexity, and Implementation in Public Health Improvement (DECIPHer), DECIPHer, School of Social Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Rod S TaylorMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.

Funding

University of Glasgow
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adaptation seeks to transfer and implement healthcare interventions developed and evaluated in one context to another. The aim of this scoping review was to understand current approaches to the adaptation of complex interventions for people with long-term conditions (LTCs) and to identify issues for studies performed in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Bibliographic databases were searched from 2000 to October 2022. This review involved five stages: (i) definition of the research question(s); (ii) identifying relevant studies; (iii) study selection; (iv) data charting; and (v) data synthesis. Extraction included an assessment of the: rationale for adaptation; stages and levels of adaptation; use of theoretical frameworks, and quality of reporting using a checklist based on the 2021 ADAPT guidance. Twenty-five studies were included from across 21 LTCs and a range of complex interventions. The majority (16 studies) focused on macro (national or international) level interventions. The rationale for adaptation included intervention transfer across geographical settings [high-income country (HIC) to LMIC: six studies, one HIC to another: eight studies, one LMIC to another: two studies], or transfer across socio-economic/racial groups (five studies), or transfer between different health settings within a single country (one study). Overall, studies were judged to be of moderate reporting quality (median score 23, maximum 46), and typically focused on early stages of adaptation (identification and development) with limited outcome evaluation or implementation assessment of the adapted version of the intervention. Improved reporting of the adaptation for complex interventions targeted at LTCs is needed. Development of future adaptation methods guidance needs to consider the needs and priorities of the LMIC context.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesChronic DiseaseDelivery of Health CareHumansadaptationcomplex interventionlong-term conditionslow-and-middle-income countriesmethodological frameworks

Identifiers

PMID38895875
PMCPMC11370634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.