Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38895789›Full record

ArticleSkin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI)2024

Genetic causal relationship between gut microbiota and basal cell carcinoma: A two-sample mendelian randomization study.

Pan Luo, Dejin Gao, Qingguo Zhang

RetractedAbstract readRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Article in Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Genetic causal relationship between gut microbiota and basal cell carcinoma: A two-sample mendelian randomization study.Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Pan LuoDepartment of Comprehensive Plastic Surgery, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Dejin GaoDepartment of Comprehensive Plastic Surgery, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Qingguo ZhangDepartment of Comprehensive Plastic Surgery, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

Funding

CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences 2021-I2M-1-068National Natural Science Foundation of China 81571924
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveResearch has previously established connections between the intestinal microbiome and the progression of some cancers. However, there is a noticeable gap in the literature in regard to using Mendelian randomisation (MR) to delve into potential causal relationships between the gut microbiota (GM) and basal cell carcinoma (BCC). Therefore, the purpose of our study was to use MR to explore the causal relationship between four kinds of GM (Bacteroides, Streptococcus, Proteobacteria and Lachnospiraceae) and BCC.

methodsWe used genome-wide association study (GWAS) data and MR to explore the causal relationship between four kinds of GM and BCC. This study primarily employed the random effect inverse variance weighted (IVW) model for analysis, as complemented by additional methods including the simple mode, weighted median, weighted mode and MR‒Egger methods. We used heterogeneity and horizontal multiplicity to judge the reliability of each analysis. MR-PRESSO was mainly used to detect and correct outliers.

resultsThe random-effects IVW results showed that Bacteroides (OR = 0.936, 95% CI = 0.787-1.113, p = 0.455), Streptococcus (OR = 0.974, 95% CI = 0.875-1.083, p = 0.629), Proteobacteria (OR = 1.113, 95% CI = 0.977-1.267, p = 0.106) and Lachnospiraceae (OR = 1.027, 95% CI = 0.899-1.173, p = 0.688) had no genetic causal relationship with BCC. All analyses revealed no horizontal pleiotropy, heterogeneity or outliers.

conclusionWe found that Bacteroides, Streptococcus, Proteobacteria and Lachnospiraceae do not increase the incidence of BCC at the genetic level, which provides new insight for the study of GM and BCC.

Indexed as

Basal Cell CarcinomaGastrointestinal MicrobiomeGenome-Wide Association StudyMendelian Randomization AnalysisSkin NeoplasmsBacteroidesGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansPolymorphism, Single NucleotideProteobacteriaStreptococcusbasal cell carcinomacausalitygeneticsgut microbiotamendelian randomisation study

Identifiers

PMID38895789
PMCPMC11187847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.