ArticleBMJ surgery, interventions, & health technologies2024
Clinical effectiveness of a modified muscle sparing posterior technique compared with a standard lateral approach in hip hemiarthroplasty for displaced intracapsular fractures (HemiSPAIRE): a multicenter, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial.
Article in BMJ surgery, interventions, & health technologies, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04095611 (The Effects of a Modified Muscle Sparing Posterior Technique), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Effects of a Modified Muscle Sparing Posterior Technique (SPAIRE) in Hip Hemiarthroplasty for Displaced Intracapsular Fractures on Post-operative Function Compared to a Standard Lateral Approach; a Randomised Controlled Trial
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- What patient reported outcome measures are used in clinical trials in hip fracture? A systematic mapping review.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Pooled it
- Surgical approaches for inserting hemiarthroplasty of the hip in people with hip fractures.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Quadratus Femoris Muscle Pedicle Bone Grafting in Early-Stage Osteonecrosis of Femoral Head.Hip & pelvis · 2026Article
- Comparison of the Piriformis-Sparing and Posterolateral Approaches in Cementless Hemiarthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fractures.Hip & pelvis · 2025Article
- No benefit in biomarkers assessing muscle damage for minimally invasive anterior over SPAIRE approach in hemiarthroplasty : a subgroup analysis with 100 patients from a randomized controlled trial.Bone & joint open · 2025Article
- The SPAIRE (saving piriformis and internus, repair of externus) posterolateral approach in bipolar hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures: a case report.Journal of trauma and injury · 2025Article
- An Acta Orthopaedica educational article: Femoral neck fractures in adults with emphasis on surgical treatment.Acta orthopaedica · 2025Review
- Review
- Quadriceps Coxae-Sparing Modified Posterior Approach to the Hip Joint for Hemiarthroplasty.JBJS essential surgical techniquesArticle
- SPAIRE Approach Versus Direct Anterior Approach in Hemiarthroplasty for Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures: A Randomized Controlled Trial.JB & JS open accessArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Assess the effect of a modified muscle sparing posterior approach; SPAIRE (Save Piriformis and Internus, Repairing Externus), in hip hemiarthroplasty for displaced intracapsular fractures on postoperative mobility and function compared with a standard lateral approach. Design: Pragmatic, superiority, multicenter, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial (with internal pilot). Participants, ward staff, and research staff conducting postoperative assessments were blinded to allocation. A CTU allocated treatments centrally using computer-generated lists. Setting: Six hospitals in Southwest England, recruiting November 25, 2019-April 25, 2022. Participants: 244 adults (≥60 years) requiring hip hemiarthroplasty (122 allocated to each approach). 90 and 85 participants allocated to SPAIRE and lateral, respectively, had primary outcome data within the prespecified data collection window. Interventions: Surgery using SPAIRE or standard lateral approach. Follow-up 3 days and 120 days postoperation. Main outcome measure: Oxford Hip Score (OHS), via telephone at 120 days. Secondary outcomes: function and mobility (3 days), pain (3 days, 120 days), discharge destination, length of hospital stay, complications and mortality (within 120 days), quality of life and place of residence (120 days). Results: Participants' mean age was 84.6 years (SD 7.2); 168 (69%) were women. Primary outcome: little evidence of a difference in OHS at 120 days; adjusted mean difference (SPAIRE-lateral) -1.23 (95% CI -3.96 to 1.49, p=0.37). Secondary outcomes: indication of lower participant-reported pain at 3 days in SPAIRE arm; no differences between arms for remaining outcomes. Conclusions: Participants' mobility and function are similar in the short term (3 days) and longer term (120 days), whether receiving the SPAIRE or lateral approach. Neither approach confers benefit over the other in terms of length of hospital stay, return to prefracture residence, survival within 120 days, or quality of life at 120 days. Participants receiving SPAIRE approach may experience less pain in the early postoperative period. Modifying the posterior approach in hip hemiarthroplasty to the SPAIRE approach gives equivalent patient outcomes to the lateral approach within 120 days. Trial registration number: NCT04095611.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.