ArticleRSC advances2024
Influence of natural additives on the properties of a milk-based compostable bioplastic.
Article in RSC advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The ongoing revolution in the plastic sector is the use of renewable and compostable materials obtained from biomass. However, their mechanical strength and thermal stability are generally not sufficient for practical applications. This study investigates the influence of natural additives on the physical-mechanical properties of a new biobased compostable bioplastic, SP-Milk®, produced from milk scraps. To provide this matrix the appropriate mechanical and thermal properties for daily use while leaving its compostability unchanged, the effect of incorporating vegetal fibres and organic particulates into the bulk bioplastic was investigated. Mechanical tests showed that fibres with a length of 2 mm are capable of increasing ductility by up to 97% compared with the original matrix, whereas fibres with a length of 10 mm led to a more effective reinforcement due to the residual resistance effect, increasing the final compressive strain from 20% (original matrix) to 70.9%. The addition of particulate yielded a harder and more resistant material, and the elastic modulus increased by 21%, although with loss of ductility, compared to SP-Milk® alone. The combination of fibres and particles resulted in the preservation of the positive effects of both components, showing a higher elastic modulus (240 ± 20 MPa, compared to 199 ± 12 MPa for the matrix), higher ductility (+50%) and higher strain at failure (+30%), compared with the matrix. Excellent compatibility between the polymeric matrix and both the fibres and the granules was confirmed using scanning electron microscopy. The thermal analysis demonstrated improved thermal stability particularly because of the effect of the combination of granules and fibres. The results validate that natural reinforcement agents are effective and ecologically advantageous.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.