ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024
Less is more: selection from a small set of options improves BCI velocity control.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We designed the discrete direction selection (DDS) decoder for intracortical brain computer interface (iBCI) cursor control and showed that it outperformed currently used decoders in a human-operated real-time iBCI simulator and in monkey iBCI use. Unlike virtually all existing decoders that map between neural activity and continuous velocity commands, DDS uses neural activity to select among a small menu of preset cursor velocities. We compared closed-loop cursor control across four visits by each of 48 naïve, able-bodied human subjects using either DDS or one of three common continuous velocity decoders: direct regression with assist (an affine map from neural activity to cursor velocity), ReFIT, and the velocity Kalman Filter. DDS outperformed all three by a substantial margin. Subsequently, a monkey using an iBCI also had substantially better performance with DDS than with the Wiener filter decoder (direct regression decoder that includes time history). Discretizing the decoded velocity with DDS effectively traded high resolution velocity commands for less tortuous and lower noise trajectories, highlighting the potential benefits of simplifying online iBCI control.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.