Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38895087›Full record

ArticleEJHaem2024

The choice of serum-free light chain analysis method could potentially have clinical consequences for myeloma patients.

Ljupco Veskovski, Ingvar Jakobsson, Per-Ola Andersson, Therese Gustafsson, Annelie Sedigh, Dorota Knut-Bojanowska, Markus Hansson, Cecilie Hveding Blimark, Ulf-Henrik Mellqvist

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EJHaem, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ljupco VeskovskiDepartment of Research Education and Innovation and Department of Medicine (Hematology Unit) Södra Älvsborg Hospital (SÄS) Borås Region Västra Götaland (VGR) Boras Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-0334-5282
Ingvar JakobssonLaboratory for Clinical Chemistry SÄS Borås and Department of Clinical Chemistry Sahlgrenska University Hospital Goteborg Sweden.
Per-Ola AnderssonDepartment of Haematology Sahlgrenska University Hospital Goteborg Sweden.
Therese GustafssonLaboratory for Clinical Chemistry SÄS Borås and Department of Clinical Chemistry Sahlgrenska University Hospital Goteborg Sweden.
Annelie SedighLaboratory for Clinical Chemistry SÄS Borås and Department of Clinical Chemistry Sahlgrenska University Hospital Goteborg Sweden.
Dorota Knut-BojanowskaDepartment of Hematology Norra Älvsborg Hospital (NÄL) Trollhattan Sweden.
Markus HanssonDepartment of Haematology Sahlgrenska University Hospital Goteborg Sweden.
Cecilie Hveding BlimarkDepartment of Haematology Sahlgrenska University Hospital Goteborg Sweden.
Ulf-Henrik MellqvistDepartment of Research Education and Innovation and Department of Medicine (Hematology Unit) Södra Älvsborg Hospital (SÄS) Borås Region Västra Götaland (VGR) Boras Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-0456-2657

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a disease, that at times poses diagnostic and monitoring challenges. Over the last decades laboratory methods have been expanded with serum free light chain (FLC) analysis. Alerted by two index cases with clinical impact due to failure of the FLC analysis to indicate a disease progression, we aimed to identify any clinical consequences due to known differences between FLC analysis methods. We applied two FLC analysis methods (Freelite Binding Site [FBS] and N-Latex Siemens [NLS]) on all patients with MM and monoclonal gammopathy of uncertain significance diagnosed/followed up at Södra Älvsborg Hematology Unit, from April to December 2022. From a total of 123 patients with malignant plasma cell disorder, we identified five cases (4.1%) where solely the FBS method, as opposed to NLS, urine and serum electrophoresis, could support diagnosis or detect progression. The consequences of this discrepancy included not only change of diagnosis or delayed therapy but also change of treatment. Our findings indicate that a stronger awareness of the potential weaknesses of different FLC methods is needed, which calls for a closer collaboration between clinical chemists and hematologists.

Indexed as

disease progressionhematologyimmunoglobulin light chainsmonoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significancemultiple myelomaparaproteinemia

Identifiers

PMID38895087
PMCPMC11182384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.