ArticleCureus2024
Oncological Outcomes of Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy and Surgical Treatment for Patients With T3 Hypopharyngeal Cancer: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Since the larynx and pharynx are vital for respiration, swallowing, and speech, chemoradiotherapy (CRT) has been widely applied for T3 hypopharyngeal cancer (HPC) as an organ-preserving treatment. However, CRT can lead to severe late adverse events such as dysphagia and aspiration pneumonia, especially in patients who have difficulty swallowing and/or aspiration at the time of initial diagnosis. Patients and methods Between 2012 and 2020, 86 patients with T3 HPC treated with curative intent at Kobe University Hospital were included in this study. The average age was 69 years old, ranging from 43 to 89. Diseases were classified as Stage III in 29 patients, Stage IVA in 52 patients, and Stage IVB in five patients. Thirty-five (41%) patients were treated by CRT, and 51 (59%) patients were treated by surgery. Patients were followed up for at least two years, and the follow-up period ranged from four to 128 months (median: 45 months). Results Three-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates of patients treated by CRT and patients treated by surgery were 56.2% and 60.3%, respectively. Three-year disease-specific survival (DSS) rates of patients treated by CRT and surgically treated patients were 79.0% vs. 70.8%, respectively. Three-year overall survival (OS) rates of patients treated by CRT and surgically treated patients were 64.5% and 69.0%, respectively. Of note, a significant difference was observed between three-year DSS and three-year PFS (79.0% vs. 56.2%, p = 0.0014) in the patients treated by CRT but not in the patients treated by surgery. Conclusions No significant differences were observed between the PFS, DSS, and OS rates of patients treated by CRT and those of surgically treated patients. Locoregional recurrences after CRT were significantly successfully salvaged by surgical intervention. These results suggest that CRT can be applied as an alternative to surgery without reducing survival, especially for patients without severe clinical symptoms. Meticulous follow-up is mandatory for early detection of recurrence to salvage by surgery and for the management of late adverse events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.