ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024
Microwave ablation with hydrodissection used for the treatment of vascular malformations: effectiveness and safety study.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07404670 (A Multicenter, Prospective Study to Analyze the Efficacy and Safety of Microwave Ablation for the Treatment of Vascular Malformations), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Multicenter, Prospective Study to Analyze the Efficacy and Safety of Microwave Ablation for the Treatment of Vascular Malformations
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Recent Advances in Interventional Management of Extracranial Vascular Malformations in Children.Seminars in interventional radiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Object: The aim of the study was to investigate the safety, effectiveness, and peripheral nerve protection in ultrasound-guided microwave ablation (US-guided-MWA) for vascular malformations (VMs) closely related to peripheral nerve. Materials and methods: From August 2019 to February 2022, 31 patients with 39 VMs received US-guided-MWA. All lesions were confirmed to be closely related to the peripheral nerve by imaging evaluation. Hydrodissection was applied to protect surrounding normal tissue, including peripheral nerves. The patients were followed up at 1day, 2 days, 3 days, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months after operation. Measurements of lesion volume, volume reduction ratio (VRR), sensory and functional abnormalities of adjacent nerves, number of treatments, complication details, personal satisfaction, recurrence, and symptom improvement were recorded. Results: Among the 39 VMs, the maximum volume is 128.58ml, while the minimum volume is 0.99ml. After a mean follow-up of 13.06 ± 4.83 months, the mean numerical rating scale (NRS) score decreased from 5.13 ± 1.65 to 0.53 ± 0.83 (P<0.0001). The mean mass volume was reduced from 18.34 ± 24.68 ml to 1.35 ± 2.09 ml (P=0.0001). The VRR of all lesions was 92.06%. However, the mean number of treatments was only 1.64 ± 0.87. All patients were satisfied with the technique, with a mean satisfaction score (SC) of 9.23 ± 1.13. There were no motor function abnormalities of the related nerves. 10 patients felt numbness in the ablation area after ablation, and gradually recovered after 1 month. Conclusion: US-guided-MWA serves as a novel alternative approach for patients with VMs. Preoperative evaluation of the relationship between VMs and peripheral nerves combined with intraoperative hydrodissection is an effective and safe method to prevent nerve injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.