Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38894848›Full record

ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2024

Remdesivir is Associated with Reduced Mortality in Patients Hospitalized for COVID-19 Not Requiring Supplemental Oxygen.

Essy Mozaffari, Aastha Chandak, Chidinma Chima-Melton, Andre C Kalil, Heng Jiang, EunYoung Lee, Celine Der-Torossian, Mark Thrun, Mark Berry, Richard Haubrich and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Real-world effectiveness of early remdesivir in reducing mortality among vulnerable patients hospitalized for COVID-19: Evidence for clinical pharmacists and inpatient care providers.American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists · 2026
    Article
  3. Real-world effectiveness of remdesivir in immunocompromised patients hospitalized due to SARS-CoV-2 Infection: Insights to inform pharmacy practice.American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Lower Mortality Risk Associated With Remdesivir + Dexamethasone Versus Dexamethasone Alone for the Treatment of Patients Hospitalized for COVID-19.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2025
    Article
  6. Public Health Benefits of Applying Evidence-Based Best Practices in Managing Patients Hospitalized for COVID-19.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2024
    Article
  7. Remdesivir for Patients Hospitalized With COVID-19: Evidence of Effectiveness From Cohort Studies in the Omicron Era.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2024
    Article
  8. Management of Vulnerable Patients Hospitalized for COVID-19 With Remdesivir: A Retrospective Comparative Effectiveness Study of Mortality in US Hospitals.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2024
    Article
  9. Remdesivir-Associated Survival Outcomes Among Immunocompromised Patients Hospitalized for COVID-19: Real-world Evidence From the Omicron-Dominant Era.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Essy MozaffariMedical Affairs, Gilead Sciences, Foster City, California, USA.
Aastha ChandakEvidence & Access, Certara, New York, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5653-435X
Chidinma Chima-MeltonDivision of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California-Los Angeles Health, Torrance, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0730-9871
Andre C KalilDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6489-6294
Heng JiangEvidence & Access, Certara, Paris, France.
EunYoung LeeMedical Affairs, Gilead Sciences, Foster City, California, USA.
Celine Der-TorossianMedical Affairs, Gilead Sciences, Foster City, California, USA.
Mark ThrunMedical Affairs, Gilead Sciences, Foster City, California, USA.
Mark BerryMedical Affairs, Gilead Sciences, Foster City, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8534-2012
Richard HaubrichMedical Affairs, Gilead Sciences, Foster City, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9435-2386
Robert L GottliebCenter for Advanced Heart and Lung Disease, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8376-8709

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Remdesivir has demonstrated benefit in some hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on supplemental oxygen and in nonhospitalized patients breathing room air. The durability of this benefit across time periods with different circulating severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 variants of concern (VOC) is unknown. This comparative effectiveness study in patients hospitalized for COVID-19 and not receiving supplemental oxygen at admission compared those starting remdesivir treatment in the first 2 days of admission with those receiving no remdesivir during their hospitalization across different VOC periods. Method: Using a large, multicenter US hospital database, in-hospital mortality rates were compared among patients hospitalized for COVID-19 but not requiring supplemental oxygen at admission between December 2020 and April 2022. Patients receiving remdesivir at hospital admission were matched 1:1 to those not receiving remdesivir during hospitalization, using propensity score matching. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess 14- and 28-day in-hospital mortality rates or discharge to hospice. Results: Among the 121 336 eligible patients, 58 188 remdesivir-treated patients were matched to 17 574 unique patients not receiving remdesivir. Overall, 5.4% of remdesivir-treated and 7.3% in the non-remdesivir group died within 14 days, and 8.0% and 9.8%, respectively, died within 28 days. Remdesivir treatment was associated with a statistically significant reduction in the in-hospital mortality rate compared with non-remdesivir treatment (14-day and 28-day adjusted hazard ratios [95% confidence interval], 0.75 [0.68-0.83] and 0.83 [0.76-0.90], respectively). This significant mortality benefit endured across the different VOC periods. Conclusions: Remdesivir initiation in patients hospitalized for COVID-19 and not requiring supplemental oxygen at admission was associated with a significantly reduced in-hospital mortality rate. These findings highlight a potential survival benefit when clinicians initiated remdesivir on admission across the dominant variant eras of the evolving pandemic.

Indexed as

comparative effectiveness researchCOVID-19hospitalizationmortalityremdesivir

Identifiers

PMID38894848
PMCPMC11182948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.