ReviewCureus2024
The Role of Platelet-Rich Plasma Injection for Muscle Strains in Athletes.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quantification and characterization of collagen in experimentally induced wounds treated with different types of platelet-rich plasma gel.Cell and tissue banking · 2026Article
- Platelet-Rich Plasma in Acute Muscle Injuries: An Umbrella Review and Meta-analysis of Return to Sport and Reinjury Outcomes.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2026Review
- Musculoskeletal ultrasound-guided cellular therapy: Current applications and future directions in skeletal muscle regeneration.Iranian journal of basic medical sciences · 2026Review
- Re-Evaluating Platelet-Rich Plasma Dosing Strategies in Sports Medicine: The Role of the "10 Billion Platelet Dose" in Optimizing Therapeutic Outcomes-A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Muscle tears/strains are among the most common musculoskeletal injuries, posing a serious challenge for sports medicine. Aiming to reduce the time to return to play and the rate of reinjuries, apart from the traditional conservative treatments and rehabilitation protocols, new and innovative therapeutic options have emerged, particularly platelet-rich plasma (PRP). This study aims to present the available evidence regarding PRP injection for the treatment of muscle strains in athletes. Two databases were searched for articles published between January 2012 and December 2022 in Portuguese or English. The query used for the PubMed database was ("Muscles/injuries"[Mesh]) AND ("Athletes"[Mesh] OR "Athletic Injuries"[Mesh]) AND "Platelet-Rich Plasma"[Mesh], while for the Web of Science database the search was performed for "Platelet-rich plasma" AND "Muscle injuries" AND ("Athletes" OR "Athletic injuries"). Eleven studies involving athletes diagnosed with muscle injuries who received treatment with PRP injection alone, or in combination with traditional conservative treatment, compared to a control group, were included. Four randomized controlled trials, four systematic reviews/meta-analyses, two retrospective studies, and one comparative study were included. Current evidence from the highest-quality studies does not support the hypothesis of reduction of time to return to play and the rate of reinjuries after PRP injection, even though some studies reported positive results. However, the available evidence suggests that PRP might have a beneficial effect on the pain perceived by athletes following an acute muscle strain. It is challenging to arrive at definitive conclusions and translate these findings into a clinical context for treating muscle strains in athletes. The existing trials present several inconsistencies and limitations, with a heterogeneous set of patients and injuries, as well as the use of different and inconsistent methods for preparing, administering, and measuring the effects of PRP. To achieve consistent outcomes, standardizing PRP administration procedures is essential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.