ReviewCureus2024
Effects of Targeted Hypercapnia on Mortality and Length of Stay of Post-cardiac Arrest Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Therapeutic hypercapnia has been proposed as a potential strategy to enhance cerebral perfusion and improve outcomes in patients after cardiac arrest. However, the effects of targeted hypercapnia remain unclear. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the impact of hypercapnia compared to normocapnia on mortality and length of stay in post-cardiac arrest patients. We searched major databases for randomized controlled trials and observational studies comparing outcomes between hypercapnia and normocapnia in adult post-cardiac arrest patients. Data on in-hospital mortality and the ICU and hospital length of stay were extracted and pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. Five studies (two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and three observational studies) with a total of 1,837 patients were included. Pooled analysis showed hypercapnia was associated with significantly higher in-hospital mortality compared to normocapnia (56.2% vs. 50.5%, OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.12-1.37, p<0.001). There was no significant heterogeneity (I2 = 25%, p = 0.26). No statistically significant differences were found for ICU length of stay (mean difference 0.72 days, 95% CI -0.51 to 1.95) or hospital length of stay (mean difference 1.13 days, 95% CI -0.67 to 2.93) between the groups. Sensitivity analysis restricted to mild hypercapnia studies did not alter the mortality findings. This meta-analysis did not find a mortality benefit with targeted hypercapnia compared to normocapnia in post-cardiac arrest patients. The results align with current guidelines recommending a normal partial pressure of arterial carbon dioxide (PaCO2) target range and do not support routinely targeting higher carbon dioxide levels in this setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.