ArticleCureus2024
Comparison of Postoperative Results With Prognostic Nutritional Index for Lumbar Disc Herniation.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe prognostic nutritional index (PNI) is an immune-nutritional index simply provided by a blood test. We retrospectively compared the postoperative outcomes of patients with lumbar disc herniation divided into two groups according to the PNI. MATERIALS AND
methodsSeventy-three patients who underwent surgery at our hospital were included in the study. All patients had herniation between one of the L3/4, L4/5, or L5/S intervertebral discs and underwent one posterior lumbar interbody fusion. These patients were divided into two groups: patients with a PNI of <50 (poorly nourished (PN) group) and patients with a PNI of ≥50 (well-nourished (WN) group). Evaluation items included patient background characteristics, operative time, blood loss, postoperative complications, and length of hospital stay.
resultsThe results showed that the body mass index was significantly higher in the WN group than in the PN group (p=0.0221). The rates of collagen disease, steroid use, and postoperative complications were significantly higher (p=0.0475, p=0.0073, and p=0.0211, respectively) and the length of hospital stay was significantly longer (p=0.021) in the PN group than in the WN group.
conclusionIn conclusion, this study indicates that postoperative complications and the length of hospital stay are significantly worse in PN patients than in WN patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.