Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38894731›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of pain = Revue canadienne de la douleur2024

Patient-Reported Wait Times and the Impact of Living with Chronic Pain on their Quality of Life: A Waiting Room Survey in Chronic Pain Clinics in Ontario, Manitoba, and Quebec.

Clare Liddy, Lynn Cooper, Geoff Bellingham, Tracy Deyell, Pablo Ingelmo, Isabella Moroz, Patricia Poulin, Alexander Singer, Gabrielle S Logan, Regina Visca and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of pain = Revue canadienne de la douleur, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Between Ideal and Actual Care: Patients' and Family Carers' Experiences of Cancer Care Relationships.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Clare LiddyDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0699-5494
Lynn CooperCanadian Injured Workers Alliance, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada.
Geoff BellinghamDepartment of Anesthesia & Perioperative Medicine, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Tracy DeyellC.T. Lamont Primary Health Care Research Centre, Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Pablo IngelmoEdwards Family Interdisciplinary Center for Complex Pain, Division of Pediatric Anesthesia, Montreal Children's Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Isabella MorozC.T. Lamont Primary Health Care Research Centre, Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Patricia PoulinDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Ottawa Hospital Pain Clinic, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Alexander SingerDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5436-8394
Gabrielle S LoganDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7007-9373
Regina ViscaDepartment of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
Amin ZahraiClinical Epidemiology, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Norman BuckleyDepartment of Anesthesia, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Wait times at Canadian multidisciplinary pain clinics have been reported as excessive for nearly 2 decades. Aims: The aim of this study was to gain insight into the patient experience of waiting for chronic pain specialty care. Methods: A cross-sectional survey of new patients waiting for an appointment was conducted in six multidisciplinary pain clinics, including one pediatric clinic, in Ontario, Quebec, and Manitoba between February 2020 and October 2022. Participants were asked about the length of time they waited for their appointment since being referred, their quality of life, health care professionals seen while waiting, and an open-ended question, "Is there anything else you'd like to tell us?" Results: Among the 493 adult and 100 pediatric respondents, 53% of adults and 82% of children reported wait times under 6 months, whereas 22% of adults and 4% of children waited longer than a year. Between 52% and 63% of adults and 29% to 48% of children reported being affected by chronic pain "quite a bit" or "extremely" on measures of quality of life. The most visited health care professionals while waiting for a pain clinic appointment were family doctors/nurse practitioners for adults and physiotherapists for children. Qualitative analysis of open-ended question responses revealed eight themes: system navigation issues, administrative issues, decreased quality of life, distress, self-advocacy, coping strategies, communication, and distrust. Conclusions: Our findings provide real-time regional snapshots into the impact of long wait times experienced by Canadians living with chronic pain. There is an urgent need to better support patients during the waiting period. Expanding technologies such as electronic consultation hold great promise.

Indexed as

Chronic painpatient experiencequality of lifewait times

Identifiers

PMID38894731
PMCPMC11185187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.