Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38894711›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in molecular biosciences2024

Integrating proteomics and explainable artificial intelligence: a comprehensive analysis of protein biomarkers for endometrial cancer diagnosis and prognosis.

Seyma Yasar, Fatma Hilal Yagin, Rauf Melekoglu, Luca Paolo Ardigò

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in molecular biosciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Seyma YasarDepartment of Biostatistics, and Medical Informatics, Medicine Faculty, Inonu University, Malatya, Türkiye.
Fatma Hilal YaginDepartment of Biostatistics, and Medical Informatics, Medicine Faculty, Inonu University, Malatya, Türkiye.
Rauf MelekogluDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Inonu University, Malatya, Türkiye.
Luca Paolo ArdigòDepartment of Teacher Education, NLA University College, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endometrial cancer, which is the most common gynaecological cancer in women after breast, colorectal and lung cancer, can be diagnosed at an early stage. The first aim of this study is to classify age, tumor grade, myometrial invasion and tumor size, which play an important role in the diagnosis and prognosis of endometrial cancer, with machine learning methods combined with explainable artificial intelligence. 20 endometrial cancer patients proteomic data obtained from tumor biopsies taken from different regions of EC tissue were used. The data obtained were then classified according to age, tumor size, tumor grade and myometrial invasion. Then, by using three different machine learning methods, explainable artificial intelligence was applied to the model that best classifies these groups and possible protein biomarkers that can be used in endometrial prognosis were evaluated. The optimal model for age classification was XGBoost with AUC (98.8%), for tumor grade classification was XGBoost with AUC (98.6%), for myometrial invasion classification was LightGBM with AUC (95.1%), and finally for tumor size classification was XGBoost with AUC (94.8%). By combining the optimal models and the SHAP approach, possible protein biomarkers and their expressions were obtained for classification. Finally, EWRS1 protein was found to be common in three groups (age, myometrial invasion, tumor size). This article's findings indicate that models have been developed that can accurately classify factors including age, tumor grade, and myometrial invasion all of which are critical for determining the prognosis of endometrial cancer as well as potential protein biomarkers associated with these factors. Furthermore, we were able to provide an analysis of how the quantities of the proteins suggested as biomarkers varied throughout the classes by combining the SHAP values with these ideal models.

Indexed as

biomarkerendometrium cancerexplainable artificial intelligencemachine learningproteomic

Identifiers

PMID38894711
PMCPMC11184912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.