ArticleJournal of athletic training2024
Collegiate Student-Athletes' Use and Knowledge of Third-Party-Tested Nutritional Supplements: An Exploratory Study.
Article in Journal of athletic training, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Label Accuracy and Quality of Select Weight-Loss Dietary Supplements Sold on or near US Military Bases.Nutrients · 2024Article
- Cross-validation of the safe supplement screener (S3) predicting consistent third-party-tested nutritional supplement use in NCAA Division I athletes.Frontiers in nutrition · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
contextNutritional supplement use in athletes is common, accompanied by potential doping risk.
objectiveTo determine athletes' nutritional supplement and third-party-tested (TPT) supplement use, supplement knowledge, and factors influencing their behavior.
designCross-sectional study.
settingNational Collegiate Athletic Association Division I athletic departments. PATIENTS OR OTHER
participantsStudent-athletes (n = 410, 53% female, age = 21.4 ± 1.6 years). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Survey questions addressed topics including nutritional supplement knowledge and use, TPT supplement knowledge and use, and logo recognition, and data were stratified for sex differences.
resultsAthletes (91%) reported the use of supplements, but the total number of supplements used was lower in female (median = 7; interquartile range, 4-11) than in male (median = 9; interquartile range, 4-12) athletes, with U = 17 960 and P = .01. A total of 48% (n = 191, out of 402 responses) reported purchasing supplements outside of their athletic department, with significantly fewer female (40%, n = 84) than male (56%, n = 107) athletes reporting this behavior (χ2 = 11.20, P < .001). No association between TPT logo recognition and TPT use was seen (χ2 = 0.238, P = .63). Of all athletes using supplements, 38% (n = 140) reported "consistent TPT use," whereas female athletes (36%, n = 70) reported this less often than male athletes (41%, n = 70, χ2 = 0.952, P < .32). No sex differences were seen for receiving nutritional counseling (89%, P = .37) or low nutritional supplement knowledge (<50%, P = .38); however, males had 2.5 times greater odds at recognizing a TPT organization logo than females (odds ratio = 2.45; 95% CI, 1.58-3.79).
conclusionsMost athletes use nutritional supplements. Female athletes report slightly fewer supplements than male athletes, while also less frequently purchasing them outside their athletic department, potentially explaining the lower TPT logo recognition in female athletes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.