Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38894638›Full record

ArticleConservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology2025

Simulating the efficacy of wolf-dog hybridization management with individual-based modeling.

Nina Luisa Santostasi, Sarah Bauduin, Oksana Grente, Olivier Gimenez, Paolo Ciucci

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A Fast TaqManGenes · 2025
    Article
  2. Introgression-Friend or Foe?Molecular ecology · 2025
    Article
  3. Simulating the efficacy of wolf-dog hybridization management with individual-based modeling.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nina Luisa SantostasiDepartment of Biology and Biotechnologies "Charles Darwin", Sapienza University of Rome, Roma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9148-7069
Sarah BauduinDirection de la Recherche et Appui Scientifique, Service Conservation et Gestion des Espèces à Enjeux, Office Français de la Biodiversité, Juvignac, France.
Oksana GrenteCEFE, CNRS, Univ. Montpellier, EPHE, IRD, Montpellier, France.
Olivier GimenezCEFE, CNRS, Univ. Montpellier, EPHE, IRD, Montpellier, France.
Paolo CiucciDepartment of Biology and Biotechnologies "Charles Darwin", Sapienza University of Rome, Roma, Italy.

Funding

European Union (NextGenerationEU, National Biodiversity Future Center)French National Research Agency ANRSapienza Università di Roma RP1181642371C340
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introgressive hybridization between wolves and dogs is a conservation concern due to its potentially deleterious long-term evolutionary consequences. European legislation requires that wolf-dog hybridization be mitigated through effective management. We developed an individual-based model (IBM) to simulate the life cycle of gray wolves that incorporates aspects of wolf sociality that affect hybridization rates (e.g., the dissolution of packs after the death of one/both breeders) with the goal of informing decision-making on management of wolf-dog hybridization. We applied our model by projecting hybridization dynamics in a local wolf population under different mate choice and immigration scenarios and contrasted results of removal of admixed individuals with their sterilization and release. In several scenarios, lack of management led to complete admixture, whereas reactive management interventions effectively reduced admixture in wolf populations. Management effectiveness, however, strongly depended on mate choice and number and admixture level of individuals immigrating into the wolf population. The inclusion of anthropogenic mortality affecting parental and admixed individuals (e.g., poaching) increased the probability of pack dissolution and thus increased the probability of interbreeding with dogs or admixed individuals and boosted hybridization and introgression rates in all simulation scenarios. Recognizing the necessity of additional model refinements (appropriate parameterization, thorough sensitivity analyses, and robust model validation) to generate management recommendations applicable in real-world scenarios, we maintain confidence in our model's potential as a valuable conservation tool that can be applied to diverse situations and species facing similar threats.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesHybridization, GeneticWolvesAnimalsDogsMaleModels, Biological(Canis lupus)Canis lupusdinámicas poblacionalesgestiónhibridaciónhybridizationindividual‐based modelmanagementmodelo basado en individuosmodelos de proyecciónpopulation dynamicsprojection modeling基于个体的模型杂交管理灰狼种群动态预测建模

Identifiers

PMID38894638
PMCPMC11780192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.