Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38894580›Full record

ArticleCNS neuroscience & therapeutics2024

Efficacy and safety of tocilizumab in patients with refractory generalized myasthenia gravis.

Zhe Ruan, Yonglan Tang, Ting Gao, Chunhong Li, Rongjing Guo, Chao Sun, Xiaoxi Huang, Zhuyi Li, Ting Chang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CNS neuroscience & therapeutics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. New and Emerging Biological Therapies for Myasthenia Gravis: A Focussed Review for Clinical Decision-Making.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Zhe RuanDepartment of Neurology, Tangdu Hospital, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Yonglan TangDepartment of Neurology, Tangdu Hospital, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Ting GaoDepartment of Neurology, Tangdu Hospital, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Chunhong LiDepartment of Neurology, Tangdu Hospital, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Rongjing GuoDepartment of Neurology, Tangdu Hospital, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Chao SunDepartment of Neurology, Tangdu Hospital, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Xiaoxi HuangDepartment of Neurology, Tangdu Hospital, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Zhuyi LiDepartment of Neurology, Tangdu Hospital, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Ting ChangDepartment of Neurology, Tangdu Hospital, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7546-8017

Funding

Key R & D plan of Shaanxi Province 2021ZDLSF02-01National Key Research and Development Program of China 2022YFC3501304National Natural Science Foundation of China 82271378Tangdu Hospital-Major Program of Clinical Research 2021LCYJ002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe aimed to compare the efficacy of tocilizumab with conventional immunotherapy in refractory patients with acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive (AChR-Ab+) generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG).

methodsThis single-center prospective cohort study was based on patients from an MG registry study in China and conducted from February 10, 2021 to March 31, 2022. Adult refractory patients with AChR-Ab+ gMG were assigned to tocilizumab or conventional immunotherapy groups. The primary efficacy outcome was the mean difference of MG activities of daily living (MG-ADL) change at weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 corresponding to that at the baseline between the two groups. A generalized estimating equation model was used for the primary outcome analysis. Safety was assessed based on adverse events.

resultsOf 34 eligible patients, 20 (mean [standard deviation] age, 53.8 [21.9] years; 12 [60.0%] female) received tocilizumab and 14 received conventional immunotherapy (45.8 [18.0] years; 8 [57.1%] female). The tocilizumab group had greater reduction in MG-ADL score at week 4 (adjusted mean difference, -3.4; 95% CI, -4.7 to -2.0; p < 0.001) than the conventional immunotherapy group, with significant differences sustained through week 24 (adjusted mean difference, -4.5; 95% CI, -6.4 to -2.6; p < 0.001). At week 24, the proportion of patients achieving higher levels of MG-ADL (up to 7-point reduction) and QMG (up to 11-point reduction) scores improvement was significantly greater with tocilizumab. Tocilizumab had acceptable safety profiles without severe or unexpected safety issues.

conclusionTocilizumab is safe and effective in improving the MG-ADL score and reducing prednisone dose in refractory AChR-Ab+ gMG, suggesting tocilizumab has the potential to be a valuable therapeutic option for such patients.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedMyasthenia GravisActivities of Daily LivingAdultAgedCohort StudiesFemaleHumansImmunotherapyMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRegistriesTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, Monoclonal, Humanizedtocilizumabconventional immunotherapygeneralized estimating equationgeneralized myasthenia gravisinterleukin 6 receptortocilizumab

Identifiers

PMID38894580
PMCPMC11187874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.