ArticleCNS neuroscience & therapeutics2024
Efficacy and safety of tocilizumab in patients with refractory generalized myasthenia gravis.
Article in CNS neuroscience & therapeutics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current status and challenges of biologic targeted therapy for myasthenia gravis in China.Intractable & rare diseases research · 2026Review
- Progress in the Treatment of Refractory Myasthenia Gravis.Revista de neurologia · 2026Review
- Clinical Use of Interleukin-6 Blockade in Neuroimmunological Disorders.Noro psikiyatri arsivi · 2026Review
- Research Progress in Pharmacological Targeted Therapy for Myasthenia Gravis.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Review
- Tocilizumab Treatment in Refractory Autoimmune Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein Astrocytopathy: A Case Report and Literature Review.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Article
- A predictive model for low-dose rituximab response in anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive myasthenia gravis: establishment and validation.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Immunological Targets in Generalized Myasthenia Gravis Treatment: Where Are We Going Now?Brain sciences · 2025Review
- Immunomodulators and immunosuppressants for myasthenia gravis: a network meta-analysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Article
- Efficacy and Safety of Efgartigimod for Patients With Myasthenia Gravis in a Real-World Cohort of 77 Patients.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2025Article
- New and Emerging Biological Therapies for Myasthenia Gravis: A Focussed Review for Clinical Decision-Making.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2025Review
- Myasthenia gravis in 2025: five new things and four hopes for the future.Journal of neurology · 2025Review
- Tocilizumab for the management of corticosteroid-resistant GO combined with OMG: a case series.BMC ophthalmology · 2024Article
- Efficacy and safety of tocilizumab in patients with refractory generalized myasthenia gravis.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWe aimed to compare the efficacy of tocilizumab with conventional immunotherapy in refractory patients with acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive (AChR-Ab+) generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG).
methodsThis single-center prospective cohort study was based on patients from an MG registry study in China and conducted from February 10, 2021 to March 31, 2022. Adult refractory patients with AChR-Ab+ gMG were assigned to tocilizumab or conventional immunotherapy groups. The primary efficacy outcome was the mean difference of MG activities of daily living (MG-ADL) change at weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 corresponding to that at the baseline between the two groups. A generalized estimating equation model was used for the primary outcome analysis. Safety was assessed based on adverse events.
resultsOf 34 eligible patients, 20 (mean [standard deviation] age, 53.8 [21.9] years; 12 [60.0%] female) received tocilizumab and 14 received conventional immunotherapy (45.8 [18.0] years; 8 [57.1%] female). The tocilizumab group had greater reduction in MG-ADL score at week 4 (adjusted mean difference, -3.4; 95% CI, -4.7 to -2.0; p < 0.001) than the conventional immunotherapy group, with significant differences sustained through week 24 (adjusted mean difference, -4.5; 95% CI, -6.4 to -2.6; p < 0.001). At week 24, the proportion of patients achieving higher levels of MG-ADL (up to 7-point reduction) and QMG (up to 11-point reduction) scores improvement was significantly greater with tocilizumab. Tocilizumab had acceptable safety profiles without severe or unexpected safety issues.
conclusionTocilizumab is safe and effective in improving the MG-ADL score and reducing prednisone dose in refractory AChR-Ab+ gMG, suggesting tocilizumab has the potential to be a valuable therapeutic option for such patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.