ArticleThe American journal of case reports2024
Virtual Reality-Guided Simulation for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in a Patient with Anatomical Anomalies: A Case Report.
Article in The American journal of case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Catheterization laboratories open the doors for Extended Realities-review of clinical applications in cardiology.European heart journal. Digital health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Virtual reality (VR)-guided GC simulation for patients with anatomical anomalies using cardiac computed tomography (CT) has been recently reported. Rotational atherectomy (RA) for the left circumflex (LCX) ostium is challenging due to the tortuous anatomy, acute angulation, and variable vessel size compared to other lesions. The appropriate positioning and coaxiality of the guide catheter (GC) are key factors for safely performing RA. It would be beneficial if it could be simulated prior to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). CASE REPORT We treated a 55-year-old man with angina. We performed coronary angiography and detected an ostial calcified lesion of the LCX. We needed RA for this lesion, but PCI was very difficult and challenging. CT revealed right-sided aortic arch with stenosis of left subclavian artery from the Kommerell diverticulum at the distal part of the aortic arch. Therefore, the approach site for PCI was limited. We simulated the appropriate guide catheter and approach site for PCI by VR. PCI was successfully performed with RA, as in the VR simulation. CONCLUSIONS We successfully performed PCI for an ostial calcified lesion of the LCX in a patient with a right-sided aortic arch. Use of VR-guided GC simulation is a useful new option that can help visualize the anatomy and ensure safe procedures for complex lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.