Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38894404›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Optimizing Rare Disease Gait Classification through Data Balancing and Generative AI: Insights from Hereditary Cerebellar Ataxia.

Dante Trabassi, Stefano Filippo Castiglia, Fabiano Bini, Franco Marinozzi, Arash Ajoudani, Marta Lorenzini, Giorgia Chini, Tiwana Varrecchia, Alberto Ranavolo, Roberto De Icco and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Dante TrabassiDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 04100 Latina, Italy.
Stefano Filippo CastigliaDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 04100 Latina, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5329-5197
Fabiano BiniDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Sapienza University of Rome, 00184 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5641-1189
Franco MarinozziDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Sapienza University of Rome, 00184 Rome, Italy.
Arash AjoudaniDepartment of Advanced Robotics, Italian Institute of Technology, 16163 Genoa, Italy.
Marta LorenziniDepartment of Advanced Robotics, Italian Institute of Technology, 16163 Genoa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9458-6844
Giorgia ChiniDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Epidemiology and Hygiene, INAIL, Monte Porzio Catone, 00078 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7654-0025
Tiwana VarrecchiaDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Epidemiology and Hygiene, INAIL, Monte Porzio Catone, 00078 Rome, Italy.
Alberto RanavoloDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Epidemiology and Hygiene, INAIL, Monte Porzio Catone, 00078 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0197-6166
Roberto De IccoDepartment of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
Carlo CasaliDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 04100 Latina, Italy.
Mariano SerraoDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 04100 Latina, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3031-680X

Funding

BRIC "Bando Ricerche in Collaborazione 2022" 7074/470 DIG
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The interpretability of gait analysis studies in people with rare diseases, such as those with primary hereditary cerebellar ataxia (pwCA), is frequently limited by the small sample sizes and unbalanced datasets. The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of data balancing and generative artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms in generating synthetic data reflecting the actual gait abnormalities of pwCA. Gait data of 30 pwCA (age: 51.6 ± 12.2 years; 13 females, 17 males) and 100 healthy subjects (age: 57.1 ± 10.4; 60 females, 40 males) were collected at the lumbar level with an inertial measurement unit. Subsampling, oversampling, synthetic minority oversampling, generative adversarial networks, and conditional tabular generative adversarial networks (ctGAN) were applied to generate datasets to be input to a random forest classifier. Consistency and explainability metrics were also calculated to assess the coherence of the generated dataset with known gait abnormalities of pwCA. ctGAN significantly improved the classification performance compared with the original dataset and traditional data augmentation methods. ctGAN are effective methods for balancing tabular datasets from populations with rare diseases, owing to their ability to improve diagnostic models with consistent explainability.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsArtificial IntelligenceCerebellar AtaxiaGaitRare DiseasesAdultAgedFemaleGait AnalysisHumansMaleMiddle Agedcerebellar ataxiaconditional tabular generative artificial networkdata augmentationdata balancinggait analysisgenerative artificial intelligencegenerative artificial networkinertial measurement unitrare diseasessynthetic minority oversampling technique

Identifiers

PMID38894404
PMCPMC11175240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.