ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
GM-DETR: Research on a Defect Detection Method Based on Improved DETR.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- IDD-DETR: Insulator Defect Detection Model and Low-Carbon Operation and Maintenance Application Based on Bidirectional Cross-Scale Fusion and Dynamic Histogram Attention.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A Study on Systematic Improvement of Transformer Models for Object Pose Estimation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Defect detection is an indispensable part of the industrial intelligence process. The introduction of the DETR model marked the successful application of a transformer for defect detection, achieving true end-to-end detection. However, due to the complexity of defective backgrounds, low resolutions can lead to a lack of image detail control and slow convergence of the DETR model. To address these issues, we proposed a defect detection method based on an improved DETR model, called the GM-DETR. We optimized the DETR model by integrating GAM global attention with CNN feature extraction and matching features. This optimization process reduces the defect information diffusion and enhances the global feature interaction, improving the neural network's performance and ability to recognize target defects in complex backgrounds. Next, to filter out unnecessary model parameters, we proposed a layer pruning strategy to optimize the decoding layer, thereby reducing the model's parameter count. In addition, to address the issue of poor sensitivity of the original loss function to small differences in defect targets, we replaced the L1 loss in the original loss function with MSE loss to accelerate the network's convergence speed and improve the model's recognition accuracy. We conducted experiments on a dataset of road pothole defects to further validate the effectiveness of the GM-DETR model. The results demonstrate that the improved model exhibits better performance, with an increase in average precision of 4.9% (mAP@0.5), while reducing the parameter count by 12.9%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.