Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38894365›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Systematic Literature Review of IoT Botnet DDOS Attacks and Evaluation of Detection Techniques.

Metehan Gelgi, Yueting Guan, Sanjay Arunachala, Maddi Samba Siva Rao, Nicola Dragoni

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Metehan GelgiDTU Compute, Technical University of Denmark (DTU), 2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID 0009-0001-7772-6024
Yueting GuanDTU Compute, Technical University of Denmark (DTU), 2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.
Sanjay ArunachalaDTU Compute, Technical University of Denmark (DTU), 2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-3882-8666
Maddi Samba Siva RaoDTU Compute, Technical University of Denmark (DTU), 2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID 0009-0002-4310-737X
Nicola DragoniDTU Compute, Technical University of Denmark (DTU), 2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-9575-2990

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Internet of Things (IoT) technology has become an inevitable part of our daily lives. With the increase in usage of IoT Devices, manufacturers continuously develop IoT technology. However, the security of IoT devices is left behind in those developments due to cost, size, and computational power limitations. Since these IoT devices are connected to the Internet and have low security levels, one of the main risks of these devices is being compromised by malicious malware and becoming part of IoT botnets. IoT botnets are used for launching different types of large-scale attacks including Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) attacks. These attacks are continuously evolving, and researchers have conducted numerous analyses and studies in this area to narrow security vulnerabilities. This paper systematically reviews the prominent literature on IoT botnet DDoS attacks and detection techniques. Architecture IoT botnet DDoS attacks, evaluations of those attacks, and systematically categorized detection techniques are discussed in detail. The paper presents current threats and detection techniques, and some open research questions are recommended for future studies in this field.

Indexed as

botnetbotnet attacksDDoSdetectionIoT

Identifiers

PMID38894365
PMCPMC11175181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.