ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Remaining Useful Life Prediction Based on Deep Learning: A Survey.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Frequency-Weighted EIS Manifold Learning for Lithium-Ion Battery Remaining Useful Life Prediction.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A Review of Fault Diagnosis and Intelligent Operations and Maintenance for Agricultural Machinery: Fault Mechanisms, Key Technologies, and Practical Recommendations.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- A Fractional-Derivative Multi-Kernel Adaptive Learning Approach for Remaining Useful Life Prediction of Rotating Machinery.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Survival Models for Predictive Maintenance and Remaining Useful Life in Sensor-Enabled Smart Energy Networks: A Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- A hybrid Bi-LSTM model for data-driven maintenance planning.Autonomous intelligent systems · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Remaining useful life (RUL) is a metric of health state for essential equipment. It plays a significant role in health management. However, RUL is often random and unknown. One type of physics-based method builds a mathematical model for RUL using prior principles, but this is a tough task in real-world applications. Another type of method estimates RUL from available information through condition and health monitoring; this is known as the data-driven method. Traditional data-driven methods require significant human effort in designing health features to represent performance degradation, yet the prediction accuracy is limited. With breakthroughs in various application scenarios in recent years, deep learning techniques provide new insights into this problem. Over the past few years, deep-learning-based RUL prediction has attracted increasing attention from the academic community. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct a survey on deep-learning-based RUL prediction. To ensure a comprehensive survey, the literature is reviewed from three dimensions. Firstly, a unified framework is proposed for deep-learning-based RUL prediction and the models and approaches in the literature are reviewed under this framework. Secondly, detailed estimation processes are compared from the perspective of different deep learning models. Thirdly, the literature is examined from the perspective of specific problems, such as scenarios where the collected data consist of limited labeled data. Finally, the main challenges and future directions are summarized.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.