Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38894219›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Investigation of Security Threat Datasets for Intra- and Inter-Vehicular Environments.

Achref Haddaji, Samiha Ayed, Lamia Chaari Fourati, Leila Merghem Boulahia

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Achref HaddajiLIST3N, University of Technology of Troyes, 10300 Troyes, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0388-9840
Samiha AyedLIST3N, University of Technology of Troyes, 10300 Troyes, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4678-6956
Lamia Chaari FouratiDigital Research Center of Sfax (CRNS), Laboratory of Signals, Systems, Artificial Intelligence, Networks (SM@RTS), Sfax University, Sfax 3029, Tunisia.ORCID 0000-0003-0401-5050
Leila Merghem BoulahiaLIST3N, University of Technology of Troyes, 10300 Troyes, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vehicular networks have become a critical component of modern transportation systems by facilitating communication between vehicles and infrastructure. Nonetheless, the security of such networks remains a significant concern, given the potential risks associated with cyberattacks. For this purpose, artificial intelligence approaches have been explored to enhance the security of vehicular networks. Using artificial intelligence algorithms to analyze large datasets can enable the early identification and mitigation of potential threats. However, developing and testing effective artificial-intelligence-based solutions for vehicular networks necessitates access to diverse datasets that accurately capture the various security challenges and attack scenarios in this context. In light of this, the present survey comprehensively examines the vehicular network environment, the associated security issues, and existing datasets. Specifically, we begin with a general overview of the vehicular network environment and its security challenges. Following this, we introduce an innovative taxonomy designed to classify datasets pertinent to vehicular network security and analyze key features of these datasets. The survey concludes with a tailored guide aimed at researchers in the vehicular network domain. This guide offers strategic advice on selecting the most appropriate datasets for specific research scenarios in the field.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedatasetsInternet of Vehiclessecurityvehicular networks

Identifiers

PMID38894219
PMCPMC11174416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.