ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Influence of Excitation Parameters on Finishing Characteristics in Magnetorheological Finishing for 6063 Aluminum Alloy.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The present work is aimed at studying the effects of the magnetorheological finishing process, using a low-frequency alternating magnetic field, on the finishing performance of 6063 aluminum alloy. The study investigates the influence of key excitation parameters such as current, frequency, excitation gap, and iron powder diameter on the material removal and surface roughness (Ra) of the finished workpiece by experiments. This study employs a single-factor experimental method, and the finish surface is analyzed by a Zigo non-contact white light interferometer. The magnetic field strength in the processing area increases with the increase in the excitation current and decreases with the increase in the excitation gap. When the current frequency is set to 1 Hz, the circulation and renewal of abrasives in the magnetic cluster is most sufficient, resulting in the optimal surface roughness value for the workpiece. According to the experimental results of the excitation parameters, more suitable process parameters were selected for a two-stage finishing experiment. The surface roughness of 6063 aluminum alloy was improved from 285 nm to 3.54 nm. Experimental results highlighted that the magnetorheological finishing using a low-frequency alternating magnetic field is a potential technique for obtaining nano-scale finishing of the 6063 aluminum alloy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.