ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2024
TPMS Microarchitectures for Vertical Bone Augmentation and Osteoconduction: An In Vivo Study.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identification of an Optimal Gyroid Microarchitecture of 3D-Printed Hydroxyapatite Bone Substitutes for Vertical Bone Augmentation and Osteoconduction.Biomolecules · 2026Article
- Dental Implant Osseointegration Following Mandibular Augmentation Using 3D Printed Hydroxyapatite Blocks. An Experimental In Vivo Study.Clinical oral implants research · 2026Article
- RefinedFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Mechanical and biological properties of 3D printed bionic porous Gyroid structure implant.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2026Article
- Recent Developments in Novel TPMS Lattice Materials: Design Optimization, Performance Control, and Applications in Biomimetic Scaffolds.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Strategic advances in Vat Photopolymerization for 3D printing of calcium phosphate-based bone scaffolds: A review.Bioactive materials · 2025Review
- Strategic Uniaxial Macropore Sizing for Honeycomb-Structured Scaffolds for Enhanced Bone Reconstruction in Segmental Bone Defects.ACS omega · 2025Article
- Guidance on the assessment of the functionality of biomaterials for periodontal tissue regeneration: Methodologies and testing procedures.Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials · 2025Review
- Hybrid Biomechanical Design of Dental Implants: Integrating Solid and Gyroid Triply Periodic Minimal Surface Lattice Architectures for Optimized Stress Distribution.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
- Compressive Behavior of Novel Additively Manufactured Ti-6Al-4V Lattice Structures: Experimental and Numerical Studies.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Triply periodic minimal surface microarchitectures (TPMS) were developed by mathematicians and evolved in all kingdoms of living organisms. Renowned for their lightweight yet robust attributes, TPMS structures find application in diverse fields, such as the construction of satellites, aircrafts, and electric vehicles. Moreover, these microarchitectures, despite their intricate geometric patterns, demonstrate potential for application as bone substitutes, despite the inherent gothic style of natural bone microarchitecture. Here, we produced three TPMS microarchitectures, D-diamond, G-gyroid, and P-primitive, by 3D printing from hydroxyapatite. We explored their mechanical characterization and, further, implanted them to study their bone augmentation and osteoconduction potential. In terms of strength, the D-diamond and G-gyroid performed significantly better than the P-primitive. In a calvarial defect model and a calvarial bone augmentation model, where osteoconduction is determined as the extent of bony bridging of the defect and bone augmentation as the maximal vertical bone ingrowth, the G-gyroid performed significantly better than the P-primitive. No significant difference in performance was observed between the G-gyroid and D-diamond. Since, in real life, the treatment of bone deficiencies in patients comprises elements of defect bridging and bone augmentation, ceramic scaffolds with D-diamond and G-gyroid microarchitectures appear as the best choice for a TPMS-based scaffold in bone tissue engineering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.