Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38893806›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2024

TPMS Microarchitectures for Vertical Bone Augmentation and Osteoconduction: An In Vivo Study.

Ekaterina Maevskaia, Chafik Ghayor, Indranil Bhattacharya, Julien Guerrero, Franz E Weber

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. RefinedFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ekaterina MaevskaiaCenter of Dental Medicine, Oral Biotechnology & Bioengineering, University of Zurich, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland.
Chafik GhayorCenter of Dental Medicine, Oral Biotechnology & Bioengineering, University of Zurich, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-3016-3412
Indranil BhattacharyaCenter of Dental Medicine, Oral Biotechnology & Bioengineering, University of Zurich, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland.
Julien GuerreroCenter of Dental Medicine, Oral Biotechnology & Bioengineering, University of Zurich, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland.
Franz E WeberCenter of Dental Medicine, Oral Biotechnology & Bioengineering, University of Zurich, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-1670-2296

Funding

Swiss National Science Foundation 310030_197128
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Triply periodic minimal surface microarchitectures (TPMS) were developed by mathematicians and evolved in all kingdoms of living organisms. Renowned for their lightweight yet robust attributes, TPMS structures find application in diverse fields, such as the construction of satellites, aircrafts, and electric vehicles. Moreover, these microarchitectures, despite their intricate geometric patterns, demonstrate potential for application as bone substitutes, despite the inherent gothic style of natural bone microarchitecture. Here, we produced three TPMS microarchitectures, D-diamond, G-gyroid, and P-primitive, by 3D printing from hydroxyapatite. We explored their mechanical characterization and, further, implanted them to study their bone augmentation and osteoconduction potential. In terms of strength, the D-diamond and G-gyroid performed significantly better than the P-primitive. In a calvarial defect model and a calvarial bone augmentation model, where osteoconduction is determined as the extent of bony bridging of the defect and bone augmentation as the maximal vertical bone ingrowth, the G-gyroid performed significantly better than the P-primitive. No significant difference in performance was observed between the G-gyroid and D-diamond. Since, in real life, the treatment of bone deficiencies in patients comprises elements of defect bridging and bone augmentation, ceramic scaffolds with D-diamond and G-gyroid microarchitectures appear as the best choice for a TPMS-based scaffold in bone tissue engineering.

Indexed as

3D printingadditive manufacturingbone substituteceramicsmicroarchitectureosteoconductionTPMSvertical bone augmentation

Identifiers

PMID38893806
PMCPMC11173251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.