Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38893651›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Ultrasound-Assisted and Ultrasound-Guided Thoracentesis: An Educational Review.

Andrea Boccatonda, Chiara Baldini, Davide Rampoldi, Giacomo Romani, Antonio Corvino, Giulio Cocco, Damiano D'Ardes, Orlando Catalano, Luigi Vetrugno, Cosima Schiavone and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Bleeding Risk of Central Venous Catheterization in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.TH open : companion journal to thrombosis and haemostasis · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Andrea BoccatondaInterventional, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Ultrasound Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Sant'Orsola Malpighi Hospital, 40138 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9303-7790
Chiara BaldiniInternal Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico di Sant'Orsola, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Davide RampoldiInternal Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico di Sant'Orsola, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Giacomo RomaniInternal Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico di Sant'Orsola, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Antonio CorvinoMovement Sciences and Wellbeing Department, University of Naples Parthenope, 80133 Napoli, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6608-6252
Giulio CoccoUnit of Ultrasound in Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine and Science of Aging, Gabriele d'Annunzio University of Chieti and Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3458-5468
Damiano D'ArdesInstitute of "Clinica Medica", Department of Medicine and Aging Science, Gabriele d'Annunzio University of Chieti and Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5573-4536
Orlando CatalanoRadiology Unit, Istituto Diagnostico Varelli, 80126 Naples, Italy.
Luigi VetrugnoDepartment of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3745-8368
Cosima SchiavoneUnit of Ultrasound in Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine and Science of Aging, Gabriele d'Annunzio University of Chieti and Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy.
Fabio PiscagliaDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8264-1845
Carla SerraInterventional, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Ultrasound Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Sant'Orsola Malpighi Hospital, 40138 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5555-0745

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Thoracentesis is one of the most important invasive procedures in the clinical setting. Particularly, thoracentesis can be relevant in the evaluation of a new diagnosed pleural effusion, thus allowing for the collection of pleural fluid so that laboratory tests essential to establish a diagnosis can be performed. Furthermore, thoracentesis is a maneuver that can have therapeutic and palliative purposes. Historically, the procedure was performed based on a physical examination. In recent years, the role of ultrasound has been established as a valuable tool for assistance and guidance in the thoracentesis procedure. The use of ultrasound increases success rates and significantly reduces complications. The aim of this educational review is to provide a detailed and sequential examination of the procedure, focusing on the two main modalities, the ultrasound-assisted and ultrasound-guided form.

Indexed as

invasivelungpleural effusionprocedurethoracentesis

Identifiers

PMID38893651
PMCPMC11172328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.