Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38893643›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Enhancing Accuracy in Breast Density Assessment Using Deep Learning: A Multicentric, Multi-Reader Study.

Marek Biroš, Daniel Kvak, Jakub Dandár, Robert Hrubý, Eva Janů, Anora Atakhanova, Mugahed A Al-Antari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. How Does ACR BI-RADSDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marek BirošCarebot, Ltd., 128 00 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-2781-623X
Daniel KvakCarebot, Ltd., 128 00 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-7808-7773
Jakub DandárCarebot, Ltd., 128 00 Prague, Czech Republic.
Robert HrubýCarebot, Ltd., 128 00 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-9985-8060
Eva JanůDepartment of Radiology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, 602 00 Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-0147-211X
Anora AtakhanovaCarebot, Ltd., 128 00 Prague, Czech Republic.
Mugahed A Al-AntariDepartment of Artificial Intelligence and Data Science, Daeyang AI Center, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-4457-4407

Funding

Carebot, Ltd. X001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The evaluation of mammographic breast density, a critical indicator of breast cancer risk, is traditionally performed by radiologists via visual inspection of mammography images, utilizing the Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) breast density categories. However, this method is subject to substantial interobserver variability, leading to inconsistencies and potential inaccuracies in density assessment and subsequent risk estimations. To address this, we present a deep learning-based automatic detection algorithm (DLAD) designed for the automated evaluation of breast density. Our multicentric, multi-reader study leverages a diverse dataset of 122 full-field digital mammography studies (488 images in CC and MLO projections) sourced from three institutions. We invited two experienced radiologists to conduct a retrospective analysis, establishing a ground truth for 72 mammography studies (BI-RADS class A: 18, BI-RADS class B: 43, BI-RADS class C: 7, BI-RADS class D: 4). The efficacy of the DLAD was then compared to the performance of five independent radiologists with varying levels of experience. The DLAD showed robust performance, achieving an accuracy of 0.819 (95% CI: 0.736-0.903), along with an F1 score of 0.798 (0.594-0.905), precision of 0.806 (0.596-0.896), recall of 0.830 (0.650-0.946), and a Cohen's Kappa (κ) of 0.708 (0.562-0.841). The algorithm achieved robust performance that matches and in four cases exceeds that of individual radiologists. The statistical analysis did not reveal a significant difference in accuracy between DLAD and the radiologists, underscoring the model's competitive diagnostic alignment with professional radiologist assessments. These results demonstrate that the deep learning-based automatic detection algorithm can enhance the accuracy and consistency of breast density assessments, offering a reliable tool for improving breast cancer screening outcomes.

Indexed as

BI-RADSbreast densitycomputer-aided diagnosisdeep learningfull-field digital mammographymedical image processing

Identifiers

PMID38893643
PMCPMC11172127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.