Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38893365›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Development and Validation of a Sonication-Assisted Dispersive Liquid-Liquid Microextraction Procedure and an HPLC-PDA Method for Quantitative Determination of Zolpidem in Human Plasma and Its Application to Forensic Samples.

Inés Sánchez-Sellero, Pamela Cabarcos-Fernández, María Elena Jaureguízar-Rodríguez, Iván Álvarez-Freire, María Jesús Tabernero-Duque, Ana María Bermejo-Barrera

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Interpol review of forensic toxicology, 2023-2025.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Inés Sánchez-SelleroForensic Toxicology Service, Forensic Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, C/San Francisco s/n, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9734-0217
Pamela Cabarcos-FernándezForensic Toxicology Service, Forensic Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, C/San Francisco s/n, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6730-156X
María Elena Jaureguízar-RodríguezForensic Toxicology Service, Forensic Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, C/San Francisco s/n, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Iván Álvarez-FreireForensic Toxicology Service, Forensic Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, C/San Francisco s/n, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3967-5366
María Jesús Tabernero-DuqueForensic Toxicology Service, Forensic Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, C/San Francisco s/n, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1069-6200
Ana María Bermejo-BarreraForensic Toxicology Service, Forensic Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, C/San Francisco s/n, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1926-4546

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of z-drugs has increased worldwide since its introduction. Although the prescribing patterns of hypnotics differ among countries, zolpidem is the most widely used z-drug in the world. Zolpidem may be involved in poisoning and deaths. A simple and fast HPLC-PDA method was developed and validated. Zolpidem and the internal standard chloramphenicol were extracted from plasma using a sonication-assisted dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction procedure. The method was validated including selectivity, linearity, precision, accuracy, and recovery. The calibration range (0.15-0.6 µg/mL) covers therapeutic and toxic levels of zolpidem in plasma. The limit of quantification was set at 0.15 µg/mL. Intra- and interday accuracy and precision values were lower than 15% at the concentration levels studied. Excellent recovery results were obtained for all concentrations. The proposed method was successfully applied to ten real postmortem plasma samples. In our series, multiple substances (alcohol and/or other drugs) were detected in most cases of death involving zolpidem. Our analytical method is suitable for routine toxicological analysis.

Indexed as

Liquid Phase MicroextractionZolpidemChromatography, High Pressure LiquidHumansHypnotics and SedativesLimit of DetectionPyridinesReproducibility of ResultsSonicationHypnotics and SedativesPyridinesZolpidemdispersive liquid–liquid microextractionforensicHPLC-PDAquantificationvalidationzolpidem

Identifiers

PMID38893365
PMCPMC11173445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.