Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38893359›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2024

MPHGCL-DDI: Meta-Path-Based Heterogeneous Graph Contrastive Learning for Drug-Drug Interaction Prediction.

Baofang Hu, Zhenmei Yu, Mingke Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Baofang HuSchool of Data and Computer Science, Shandong Women's University, Jinan 250030, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1480-2920
Zhenmei YuSchool of Data and Computer Science, Shandong Women's University, Jinan 250030, China.
Mingke LiSchool of Information Science and Engineering, University of Jinan, Jinan 250024, China.

Funding

Shandong Natural Science Foundation ZR2023MF037
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The combinatorial therapy with multiple drugs may lead to unexpected drug-drug interactions (DDIs) and result in adverse reactions to patients. Predicting DDI events can mitigate the potential risks of combinatorial therapy and enhance drug safety. In recent years, deep models based on heterogeneous graph representation learning have attracted widespread interest in DDI event prediction and have yielded satisfactory results, but there is still room for improvement in prediction performance. In this study, we proposed a meta-path-based heterogeneous graph contrastive learning model, MPHGCL-DDI, for DDI event prediction. The model constructs two contrastive views based on meta-paths: an average graph view and an augmented graph view. The former represents that there are connections between drugs, while the latter reveals how the drugs connect with each other. We defined three levels of data augmentation schemes in the augmented graph view and adopted a combination of three losses in the model training phase: multi-relation prediction loss, unsupervised contrastive loss and supervised contrastive loss. Furthermore, the model incorporates indirect drug information, protein-protein interactions (PPIs), to reveal latent relations of drugs. We evaluated MPHGCL-DDI on three different tasks of two datasets. Experimental results demonstrate that MPHGCL-DDI surpasses several state-of-the-art methods in performance.

Indexed as

Drug InteractionsAlgorithmsDeep LearningHumansMachine Learningdata augmentationdrug-drug interactionheterogeneous graph contrastive learningmeta-pathprotein–protein interaction

Identifiers

PMID38893359
PMCPMC11173658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.