Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38893267›Full record

ArticleCancers2024

Spheno-Orbital Meningiomas: The Rationale behind the Decision-Making Process of Treatment Strategy.

Giuseppe Mariniello, Sergio Corvino, Giuseppe Corazzelli, Oreste de Divitiis, Giancarlo Fusco, Adriana Iuliano, Diego Strianese, Francesco Briganti, Andrea Elefante

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Giuseppe MarinielloDepartment of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, Division of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy.
Sergio CorvinoDepartment of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, Division of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4918-6857
Giuseppe CorazzelliDepartment of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, Division of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy.
Oreste de DivitiisDepartment of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, Division of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7265-5418
Giancarlo FuscoDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy.
Adriana IulianoDepartment of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, Division of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy.
Diego StrianeseDepartment of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, Division of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6140-7539
Francesco BrigantiDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy.
Andrea ElefanteDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9093-7096

Funding

Italian Ministry of University and Research (MUR) CUP:E53D23011440006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surgery stands as the primary treatment for spheno-orbital meningiomas, following a symptoms-oriented approach. We discussed the decision-making process behind surgical strategies through a review of medical records from 80 patients who underwent surgical resection at the University of Naples Federico II. Different surgical approaches were employed based on the tumor's location relative to the optic nerve's long axis, categorized into lateral (type I), medial (type II), and diffuse (type III). We examined clinical, neuroradiological, surgical, pathological, and outcome factors. Proptosis emerged as the most frequent symptom (97%), followed by visual impairment (59%) and ocular motility issues (35%). Type I represented 20%, type II 43%, and type III 17%. Growth primarily affected the optic canal (74%), superior orbital fissure (65%), anterior clinoid (60%), and orbital apex (59%). The resection outcomes varied, with Simpson grades I and II achieved in all type I cases, 67.5% of type II, and 18% of type III. Recurrence rates were highest in type II (41.8%) and type III (59%). Improvement was notable in proptosis (68%) and visual function (51%, predominantly type I). Surgery for spheno-orbital meningiomas should be tailored to each patient, considering individual characteristics and tumor features to improve quality of life by addressing primary symptoms like proptosis and visual deficits.

Indexed as

cranio-orbital tumorsendoscopic transorbital approachorbital tumorsskull base meningiomassphenoid wingspheno-orbital meningiomas

Identifiers

PMID38893267
PMCPMC11171661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.